MLK, Homewreckers & Hypocrisy — Let’s Get Into It 🎙️🔥🧠

[00:00:00] Speaker: MLK at Homewreckers. We gonna get into it. Let's [00:00:05] get it.

[00:00:10] [00:00:15]

Welcome to Unsolicited Perspectives 🎙️✨📢

[00:00:16] Speaker: Welcome, first of all, welcome. This is Unsolicited [00:00:20] Perspectives. I'm your host, Bruce Anthony, here to lead the conversation and important events. And topics that are [00:00:25] shaping today's society, join the conversation of Follow us Wherever you get your audio podcast. [00:00:30] Subscribe to our YouTube channel for our video podcast, YouTube exclusive content and our YouTube membership [00:00:35] rate review.

Like, comment, share, share with your friends, share with your [00:00:40] family. Hell even share with your enemies. On today's episode,

From MLK to Messy Lawsuits — This Episode Goes Everywhere 🎢🔥🎙️

[00:00:44] Speaker: we'll be [00:00:45] remembering MLK, talking about home records, ruining marriages, and [00:00:50] talking about our short attention span. But that's enough of the intro. [00:00:55] Let's get to the show.

​

[00:01:04] Speaker: [00:01:00] For [00:01:05] people who are, you know, frequent listeners and watchers of this [00:01:10] show, y'all know that every now and then I throw little shots at Martin Luther King. [00:01:15] Uh, oftentimes I'll say Martin Luther the King. Oftentimes I'll talk about how [00:01:20] much of a hoe he was 'cause he was cheating. Run around with Coretta Scott King.

But [00:01:25] all joking aside, he is one of [00:01:30] the mo, he's one of the top five most important figures in [00:01:35] American history. I, I, I don't know where in that category he [00:01:40] rates, but definitely top five because of his [00:01:45] contributions to not only civil rights, but also human rights. But [00:01:50] it always kind of, I don't know, agitates me the hypocrisy [00:01:55] that comes around during the day of his, of [00:02:00] remembering him, right?

His Remembrance Day, Martin Luther the King Day. So [00:02:05] much so that the current administration is, is trying to get rid of it. He had to fight like hell, [00:02:10] uh, to even recognize Martin Luther King's birthday. And it [00:02:15] bothers me the hypocrisy that comes around. [00:02:20] Him and the celebration of this day because Martin Luther King [00:02:25] Jr.

And I know I said the king again, and I'm probably gonna say that a lot because I do hold [00:02:30] him in in very high regard. Martin Luther King Jr. Not [00:02:35] only has become a sanitized holiday figure, but [00:02:40] also

America Loves the Dream, Not the Disruption 💭🚫

[00:02:40] Speaker: a disruptive force who challenged power, [00:02:45] capitalism, white comfort, and American hypocrisy. So he's more than [00:02:50] just a sanitized holiday figure.

His [00:02:55] contributions to civil rights and human rights [00:03:00] should always be celebrated. But I have a feeling that [00:03:05] America loves the idea of MLK be [00:03:10] not the reality of him. And I know this because he's [00:03:15] often solely reduced to one speech. One [00:03:20] quote, I have a dream. And he's so much more than that. [00:03:25] And so I am taking the time for this first [00:03:30] segment of the show to truly [00:03:35] remember Dr.

Martin Luther King and [00:03:40] call out the hypocrisy that I see so many [00:03:45] people doing when they remember him on this holiday. [00:03:50] So let's start with what he actually stood for, because a lot of times this [00:03:55] gets lost in remembering him, like people quote it,

What MLK Actually Fought For (And Folks Ignore) ✊🏾📢📖

[00:03:59] Speaker: but they [00:04:00] don't actually focus in on what he literally stood for, and he stood for [00:04:05] full.

Civil rights, not symbolic progress. Right. [00:04:10] That's important. It wasn't lip service. He wanted full civil [00:04:15] rights. He wanted economic justice and labor rights, [00:04:20] and he was opposed to war and us imperialism. [00:04:25] So there's gonna be a lot of people that you're going to [00:04:30] see praise Martin Luther the King that aren't [00:04:35] for any of those things.

They're going to say how important he was, but [00:04:40] don't stand for any of the things that he stood for. That's the reason why I said this has become a [00:04:45] sanitized holiday, and he's become a sanitized holiday figure [00:04:50] because it's all lip service. It's all symbolic, [00:04:55] but it ain't real. He wasn't just a dreamer. He was a disruptor [00:05:00] and a strategist.

He fought against the powers. And let me explain something to you [00:05:05] guys. There's a lot of people out there now protesting ICE as well. They should [00:05:10] as well. They should. And there's a lot of people that are not affected [00:05:15] directly by ICE that are protesting. These are the [00:05:20] things that Martin Luther the King stood for, right?

These are the thing, [00:05:25] but how much skin do they really have in the game? Right? How much [00:05:30] skin do protestors that are protesting ice really have [00:05:35] in the game? 'cause Martin Luther, the King was out there protesting [00:05:40] and he had no rights. People seem to forget, like that was [00:05:45] so long ago. Uh, Jim Crow laws, he was [00:05:50] combating legal racism [00:05:55] in the face, disrupting it.

Because of that. [00:06:00] He was under constant threats, constant surveillance, and hated [00:06:05] throughout. He faced fatigue. [00:06:10] He faced fear, but he had an unwavering commitment to the cause. [00:06:15] The cause of civil rights, human rights, labor [00:06:20] rights, economic justice, opposition to a war. It was the [00:06:25] Vietnam War at that time. And he pissed a lot of people off when he opposed the Vietnam [00:06:30] War.

And he was right. History proves he was right. And [00:06:35] us imperialism like trying to force the sale of [00:06:40] Greenland, huh? Going into another country [00:06:45] and kidnapping That country's president. Huh? That's [00:06:50] us imperialism. So once again, I make the point I. [00:06:55] There's gonna be a lot of people that are celebrating [00:07:00] the sanitized figure of Martin Luther the King, [00:07:05] but not the actual person, and not what he actually stood for.[00:07:10]

Because their everyday actions are going against [00:07:15] the very things that he died for, that he [00:07:20] died for. And people always say, once again, like I said earlier, Jim Crow was so long ago. [00:07:25] Jim

Jim Crow Isn’t Ancient History — It’s Personal 🧬⏳💔

[00:07:25] Speaker: Crow. Jim Crow was my parents. Now, yes, [00:07:30] I am 45 years old. I'm a middle aged man, [00:07:35] but I'm the first generation born with all of their rights.[00:07:40]

I'm the first generation where legalized [00:07:45] racism. Legalized racism now wasn't a [00:07:50] thing for me anymore. That didn't mean that I had it sweet because progress. It [00:07:55] takes a little time, right? Like think about it. When you're trying to lose weight, [00:08:00] you could start working out and eating right in January. [00:08:05] You not gonna see results until mid-February.

[00:08:10] Now imagine, imagine hundreds of years of [00:08:15] legalized racism. How long do you think it's going to take [00:08:20] when you turn the wheels to eliminate legalized racism [00:08:25] and get to the point where everybody's equal? Not even [00:08:30] close. I always tell my clients in weight loss, the amount of time that it took [00:08:35] you to gain that weight is the amount of time it's going to take you to lose that [00:08:40] weight.

If we use that same analogy to [00:08:45] the history of this country, for 400 years, there was [00:08:50] legalized racism. Maybe we get to the point where [00:08:55] everybody is legal 400 years after the Civil Rights Movement and the Voting Rights [00:09:00] Act. That's not gonna be in my lifetime. So [00:09:05] the idea of, well, you were born with all your rights, so everything is all good.

It's [00:09:10] ridiculous. That's ridiculous because there are a hundred of years [00:09:15] where the F America's foot was on the neck of black folks, [00:09:20] and you don't just recover from that just because you take the the [00:09:25] foot off the neck, they're still bruising, they're still scarring. And for the foot to be on the [00:09:30] neck that long, you might not recover.

They may have broke your Turkey, [00:09:35] right? Windpipe might be broken, might not be able to speak well, might not be able to breathe well, that's gonna [00:09:40] carry on for the rest of your life. I'm using these analogies to show you that just because the laws [00:09:45] changed in my parents' lifetime doesn't mean that Martin Luther [00:09:50] King's dream.

Was accomplished. That's all I'm trying to [00:09:55] say.

Standing Where MLK Died Changed Me Forever 🕊️🏨😢

[00:09:55] Speaker: And it hit close and home to me. 'cause like I said, at the top, I [00:10:00] joke, I joke about Martin Luther the King, but I have an immense [00:10:05] amount of respect and love for his struggle. And it overwhelmed [00:10:10] me about to be personal. Y'all. It overwhelmed me when I went to Memphis.

'cause I went to the Lorraine [00:10:15] Hotel where he was assassinated. I stood at the spot where he was shot. I saw the [00:10:20] hotel room. Uh, it's, it's, it's this museum now. And it, you [00:10:25] know, it tells you all about the day that he was assassinated, tells you what he was doing. [00:10:30] They have a display of the food that he ate.

The pictures. [00:10:35] This man was assassinated. And what was he assassinated for? [00:10:40] For fighting for rights, for fighting for freedom, fighting [00:10:45] against legalized racism.

[00:10:50] Everybody in this country always talks about this country's great 'cause of freedom. He was fighting for it [00:10:55] and he died for it. And at that hotel I came into tears. I was with [00:11:00] somebody and I, I teared up and I had to step away. [00:11:05] Because you recognized the sacrifice this person [00:11:10] made for other people, not just himself, not just his family, not just his kids, [00:11:15] not just the future grandkids and all that type of stuff for entire people.[00:11:20]

And not just his people. For everybody, [00:11:25] everybody. He sacrificed his life. He is not [00:11:30] just a sanitized holiday figure. [00:11:35] He is an important person that has to be remembered for the [00:11:40] sacrifice that he gave for the cause that was so very, very important. [00:11:45] Let's examine the [00:11:50] sacrifice he gave, which was his life.

Right? And, and [00:11:55] why at the top? I, I, I said, I, I, I hit kind of like a [00:12:00] chuckle from the hypocrisy of certain people who try to [00:12:05] remember him, but are actively fighting against all of his ideals and principles. [00:12:10] You don't believe me. Well, I got proof 'cause you know, I wasn't gonna come on here without having [00:12:15] proof.

So I got proof. Let's compare the anti civil

Dixiecrats, Party Switches & Civil Rights Pushback 🔄🏛️📉

[00:12:19] Speaker: rights [00:12:20] movement. 'cause there was a civil rights movement and there was a pushback. Right? It and you know, [00:12:25] there was a pushback. You can't deny that there was a pushback. There was the Dixiecrats. [00:12:30] Yes. They were Democrats, they were the Dixiecrats. They're now the [00:12:35] Republican party in the south.

The idea that a lot of [00:12:40] Republicans today try to say, well, who's the Democrats that have always been racist? They were [00:12:45] dixiecrats. You are absolutely right. During that time, they were Democrats. They [00:12:50] changed parties, much like I'm going to talk about in the second segment with somebody changing party. They [00:12:55] changed parties.

The Dixiecrats were the overwhelming majority in the [00:13:00] South in the sixties. Once Lyndon Baes Johnson passed the Civil Rights [00:13:05] Act and the Voting Rights Act, there was a switch. There was a shift to the Republican [00:13:10] party and Nixon running on I identity [00:13:15] politics. All those people who were dixiecrats became Republicans.

[00:13:20] So those people who are Republicans today were the former Dixiecrats, [00:13:25] and these were the people that were combating civil rights. They were part of [00:13:30] the anti civil rights movement. Who else is a part of the Republican Party right [00:13:35] now? Maga. What were some of the core ideas of [00:13:40] anti civil rights people and movement?

Right. The core idea [00:13:45] was a opposition that never disappeared. It only rebranded [00:13:50] to the MAGA party they believed in. And here was the reddick in the sixties [00:13:55] that was combating against Martin Luther King and the civil rights movement. Here was [00:14:00] their rhetoric, law and Order. They had [00:14:05] outside agitators, or they said that these people who were fighting for civil rights were [00:14:10] outside agitators.

And they also said, this is not the right time for the Civil Rights Movement. [00:14:15] Hmm. Who else [00:14:20] says these things? Could it be the MAGA party? [00:14:25] I'm not calling it all Republicans. I'm specifically speaking to maga. And [00:14:30] by the way, we need the Republicans who are not MAGA to fight against [00:14:35] maga. And you're starting to see some of these people do that.

Right? But I'm speaking [00:14:40] specifically to maga, specifically to them. What do they all, their number one [00:14:45] thing is law and order. That's the same thing that they were saying when they were trying to combat the Civil Rights [00:14:50] movement in the sixties. MAGA is just repeating the same line.

MAGA Rhetoric Is a Remix of the 1960s 🎭📢🕰️

[00:14:54] Speaker: [00:14:55] They're always talking about these people are outside agitators.

That's what they called Martin Luther the [00:15:00] King. They called him a communist. Called 'em a socialist. [00:15:05] Same things that are being you weaponized right now [00:15:10] by the same grouping of people. Just a new generation [00:15:15] they were using back then and they're using it now [00:15:20] and not the right time is never the right time.

It is never the right time for [00:15:25] these people to have progress, because that's what we're talking about. We're talking [00:15:30] about progress moving us as a society forward. [00:15:35] There's never time for that. So there are direct [00:15:40] parallels between the anti civil rights movement of the sixties [00:15:45] and maga, and as I said, [00:15:50] it brings a chuckle because of the contradiction that you're gonna have a lot of [00:15:55] MAGA people out there celebrating Dr.

King when they're [00:16:00] actively, actively fighting against every single one of their [00:16:05] principles. And what are the principles that these [00:16:10] MAGA. People are fighting about the same ones who will [00:16:15] celebrate and, and post something on their, on their website or [00:16:20] on their Twitter page or on their Instagram post profile.

They will celebrate Martin Luther the [00:16:25] King at the same time, voting against voting rights, [00:16:30] racial equality, and social justice. That was the attack on [00:16:35] D-E-I-D-E-I is diversity, equity, and inclusion, not [00:16:40] quotas. They talk about a meritocracy, but they don't believe in a [00:16:45] meritocracy because that's what DEI was doing was creating a meritocracy, was creating [00:16:50] a bigger pool of competitors.

But they don't want a bigger pool of competitors [00:16:55] because when there's a bigger pool of competitors, you gotta compete. And when you gotta compete, [00:17:00] you go head up against somebody. You might realize that everything that they done told you that you were, was [00:17:05] a lie. That you're not good enough, that you're not smart enough, and that there's somebody [00:17:10] else that doesn't look like you, that is better, whether that's a person of color or a [00:17:15] woman, and that's, that's too [00:17:20] big of a pill to swallow, so you'll actively fight [00:17:25] against progress.

At the same time, celebrate Martin Luther the [00:17:30] King.

Performative Praise vs Real MLK Principles 🎤🎭❌

[00:17:32] Speaker: It's performative reverence [00:17:35] versus active resistance to MLK's ideas. [00:17:40] You're performing but you ain't got your [00:17:45] hand in the dirt. MLK would be labeled, woke today. [00:17:50] Let that hit you. He would be labeled woke today, woke has [00:17:55] been weaponized as this word that has a negative connotation.[00:18:00]

I almost get ready to smack people when they say woke in front of me. [00:18:05] I'm like, that's not what the word means. That's not the intention behind it. And you actually [00:18:10] want to be woke. You want to be awakened. Everybody talks about the red pill and blue pill, [00:18:15] uh, in the matrix. You had a choice. Stay locked in the [00:18:20] system or become aware of the system that's being woke, [00:18:25] and that's been weaponized.

Martin [00:18:30] Luther King would be woke today. He'd be labeled as woke. He'd be attacked by the very [00:18:35] people that's going to celebrate him. You don't see the hypocrisy [00:18:40] in it. I, like I said, I get a chuckle. I laugh at the people who are so unserious [00:18:45] and those people that are close to me know I'm gonna call you out on it.

I'm gonna call you [00:18:50] out on it. There's nobody close to me. That's, that's maga I, I won't allow anybody to be [00:18:55] close to me. That's maga like, that's, that's not happening. But there are some people who are teetering [00:19:00] that aren't close to me, but have proximity to me and I pull them on their shit all the [00:19:05] time.

I'm like, you say this, you say you believe in these things. You say you're [00:19:10] celebrating Martin Luther King, but yet you're part of the problem. [00:19:15] You're part of the people that are trying to [00:19:20] reduce voting rights, who are reducing racial equity, [00:19:25] who are reducing social [00:19:30] justice. The very principles that Martin Luther the King stood on, [00:19:35] but yet you going to praise him.

I know. I've been preaching. [00:19:40] And you know, I don't like to start the first segment like that, but I definitely [00:19:45] wanted to give MLK his real flowers, not a performative [00:19:50] flowers, his real flowers. He's one of the top five most [00:19:55] important figures in this country, and that can't be denied. But what is an [00:20:00] absolute fact is that he was vilified when he was alive, [00:20:05] celebrated later in death, and [00:20:10] became this sanitized figure that everybody could praise [00:20:15] all the while. If he was alive today, he would still be vilified. [00:20:20] That is fascinating, the hypocrisy and the [00:20:25] moral gymnastics that people will, will go through to [00:20:30] justify their actions and [00:20:35] not acknowledge their faults.

But [00:20:40] there is a story

The Julia Roberts Story That Explains MLK’s Legacy 🤝🎭❤️

[00:20:42] Speaker: that truly symbolizes [00:20:45] who Martin Luther the King was, who his family was and how his [00:20:50] legacy is. So very important. I know I've talked about it before, but maybe not in great [00:20:55] detail. The connection that Julia Roberts, who was still in my top five, uh, women of all [00:21:00] time, 'cause oh my God, and Martin Luther, the king, the Roberts [00:21:05] family, and Martin Luther the King.

And I know y'all are joking on me, you keep calling Martin Luther the King. Yeah. It's on [00:21:10] purpose. So there is a story [00:21:15] that there is a connection between Julia Roberts and Martin Luther the king. [00:21:20] So Walter and Betty Lou Roberts ran an actors and [00:21:25] writers workshop in Atlanta, a children's theater school that was one of the only [00:21:30] integrated programs in the area accepting both black and white kids.[00:21:35]

Coretta Scott King reached out to Julia's mother because the king children [00:21:40] were being refused by other acting schools due to racism, and the Roberts [00:21:45] welcomed them. With no hesitation, the Roberts and the Kings became friends [00:21:50] through this shared commitment to integration art and giving their kids [00:21:55] space to learn and perform together.

When Julie Roberts was born, her [00:22:00] parents were struggling financially and could not afford the hospital Bill Martin Luther [00:22:05] the King Jr. And Coretta Scott King stepped in and paid the bill as a gesture of [00:22:10] gratitude and solidarity for what the Roberts had done for their children and [00:22:15] for integrated inter case education.

This [00:22:20] story and everything I said previously about [00:22:25] Martin Luther, the King's accomplishments is a true reflection of his legacy. [00:22:30] It shows a compassion across lines of race [00:22:35] and class. The dream was always about a shared [00:22:40] humanity in America where kindness and solidarity [00:22:45] replaced fear and division. Maybe honoring [00:22:50] MLK today means acting more like the kings and less like the people who fought against [00:22:55] him.

​

[00:23:03] Speaker: [00:23:00] One time when I was in my [00:23:05] youth, I was in a long-term relationship and. [00:23:10] Like I said in my youth before, if you listen and watch this show, I wasn't really a [00:23:15] great guy. I love the person that I am today. I detest the person that I used to [00:23:20] be so selfish, so self-centered, really don't like him. And I used to [00:23:25] cheat.

I used to cheat. Okay. And it's [00:23:30] funny because I always put the blame on the women that I was cheating [00:23:35] with and even gave them a name. Well, I gave them a title [00:23:40] and one was

When I Was the Problem: Confessions of a Cheater 😬🪞💥

[00:23:41] Speaker: home record one, and one was home record two. [00:23:45] They were trying to wreck my home because I couldn't control myself. You know, you see the, [00:23:50] you see the hypocrisy and the childish childishness in it, but I labeled them [00:23:55] homewreckers.

Did you know that there are, there is a [00:24:00] statute in a few states where homewrecker is actually a thing, [00:24:05] right? And there's a law and people can sue. [00:24:10] Third parties for wrecking their marriage. [00:24:15] I'm not lying to you. That's a real thing. It's called the Alienation [00:24:20] of Affection Act or Law.

The “Homewrecker Law” Is Real — And Still Active ⚖️😳📜

[00:24:22] Speaker: It's a type of heart bomb [00:24:25] tort that allows a spouse to sue a third party who allegedly [00:24:30] stole the affection of their husband or wife and caused the breakup of [00:24:35] their marriage.

Alienation of Affection is actually a real law, [00:24:40] quote unquote, the Homewrecker Law. Most states abolish [00:24:45] these kinds of lawsuits in the mid 20th century as outdated and misogynistic, but [00:24:50] a small handful still recognize them. Currently reporting notes that North [00:24:55] Carolina and only a few other states keep the alienation of Affection [00:25:00] Law on the books.

It's still an active law. Now you, you, [00:25:05] there's was research of certain laws that were still on the books, like [00:25:10] sodomy is still on the books in Georgia. Like these are crazy things. [00:25:15] But this law really exists and for the, there's a lot of [00:25:20] married people out there that had their marriages or divorce people that had their [00:25:25] marriages ended because of adultery.

And come to [00:25:30] find out, if you was in North Carolina, you could have sued, [00:25:35] uh, to win. Plaintiffs generally must [00:25:40] show couple of things. There was a valid marriage with genuine love and [00:25:45] affection. The affection was destroyed or seriously damaged, [00:25:50] and the defendant engaged in wrongful malicious conduct that [00:25:55] caused the loss of affection.

So lemme break that down in layman's terms. You gotta [00:26:00] prove that there was love in the marriage. You gotta prove that the love was [00:26:05] destroyed or seriously damaged in the marriage. And then you gotta prove that the person that you're [00:26:10] suing, the defendant wrongfully and maliciously [00:26:15] caused the loss of this love of affection.

In [00:26:20] North Carolina case law, like the 1957 decision, Bishop v Glasner [00:26:25] spells out these elements and treats alienation of affection as a way to recover money, [00:26:30] damages for the loss. Emotional harm tied to a [00:26:35] relationship's breakdown. Critics argue these laws commod commodify relationships and [00:26:40] are weaponized in messy divorces.

You don't think, while supporters claim [00:26:45] they deter adultery and give wrong spouses a legal [00:26:50] remedy when a third party intentionally interferes with their marriage? [00:26:55] Y'all don't see the humor in this. First of all, [00:27:00] you're not gonna detour adultery. Adultery. It [00:27:05] goes all the way back to the beginning of times.

'cause it's in the Bible. It's in the [00:27:10] Bible. So people have been adulterous since I, maybe [00:27:15] Adam and Eve, maybe a little bit after Adam and Eve. They, they've been adulterous. [00:27:20] Okay. Nothing detours, adultery even burning [00:27:25] in hell, quote unquote. Don't detour that. So being deter that, so don't [00:27:30] so suing. I don't think it's gonna stop adultery.

So just that [00:27:35] idea is idiotic in the first place. I [00:27:40] understand the idea of being [00:27:45] angry in a breakup because you were [00:27:50] left for somebody else. Like [00:27:55] that takes a real hit on the pride. It's happened to me, it's happened to me. Not in my marriage, [00:28:00] but uh, in relationships. You know, everybody. I done told the story [00:28:05] when I was at college when the girl cheated on me and I was crying, beating the guy up and saying, Hey, you [00:28:10] know, I know this ain't your fault, but somebody got feeling my pain.

I done told that story before. Right? That's a [00:28:15] painful thing to be left for somebody else. [00:28:20] Uh, for men, it hits our pride. Not to say [00:28:25] that it's worse for a man or a woman. I'm just explaining from a male's point of view. 'cause I [00:28:30] don't understand from a female's point of view, 'cause I'm not a female. I identify as [00:28:35] cis male.

So from a male's point of view, it hits the pride, it [00:28:40] hurts, it really hurts. And if I could have sued somebody and got some money out [00:28:45] the deal, that would make me feel a little bit better. I mean, money does help with [00:28:50] happiness. It helps, doesn't create happiness, [00:28:55] but it helps not being as sad. If you get a little bit of that money [00:29:00] now, I bet you're wondering like Bruce, okay, so you got the [00:29:05] alienation of affection like that.

That's a cute little thing. But the second segment is [00:29:10] typically a little bit more serious and, and you're being silly. Why wouldn't [00:29:15] you put Martin Luther the King segment in the second segment? Because it seems like you're being [00:29:20] silly. Well, let me tell you why this is in the second [00:29:25] segment.

Sinema, Party Switching & A Modern Hypocrisy Playbook 🏛️🔄🤔

[00:29:26] Speaker: Y'all remember Kristen Sessman.

She is a former Arizona [00:29:30] senator whose centralist brand high profile votes and breaking from the [00:29:35] Democrats. Remember, I told you in the first segment the dixiecrats broke [00:29:40] from the Democratic party and are now maggot Republicans? Right [00:29:45] here is Kristen SMA breaking from the Democrats on key issues and made [00:29:50] her one of the co most controversial figures in recent US politics.

She [00:29:55] even changed her affiliation from a Democrat [00:30:00] to an independent. Why did I bring up homewrecker? [00:30:05] And this former senator, she is now facing a civil [00:30:10] homewrecker lawsuit tied to an alleged affair with a married bodyguard [00:30:15] under an under the alienation of affection law. [00:30:20] Yes, that's right. This law is actually being being [00:30:25] used present day, and when I say present day to [00:30:30] day, it is being used now.

There are so [00:30:35] many things about this story that I humorous and interesting. [00:30:40] First, the person, she was a, [00:30:45] started out as an Arizona legislator and then [00:30:50] ran for US Senate in 2018. Why was she important? She won an open [00:30:55] seat that was vacated by Jeff Flake, defeating a Republican and [00:31:00] becoming the first woman.

Dig this here. The first [00:31:05] woman and first openly bisexual person elected to the Senate from [00:31:10] Arizona. She's a trailblazer, right? [00:31:15] She's an important figure in American history. She's the [00:31:20] first, not only the first woman senator from the state of Arizona, which is an [00:31:25] accomplishment in and of itself. Shouldn't be an accomplishment in today's day and age, but is, [00:31:30] but also openly bisexual.

Now, the [00:31:35] cynic in me says she had to run as a Democrat to be an [00:31:40] open, bisexual person running for Senate. 'cause there's no way in [00:31:45] hell she would win as an openly bisexual person running as a [00:31:50] Republican. You wanna know how I know this? 'cause Lindsey Graham hasn't come out [00:31:55] yet. Now, okay, that's an accusation.

That's hearsay. There's no, I don't have any [00:32:00] fact to back that up, but I mean, [00:32:05] do you think I'm wrong? It's an accusation. It's not [00:32:10] founded. I have no facts. Don't really care if he [00:32:15] is or isn't. Think it would be important. If he did come out, if he was [00:32:20] gay. I'm just saying if one plus one equals two, [00:32:25] then you know Lindsey Graham.

But anyway, like [00:32:30] she was, she was very important. And like, [00:32:35] again, like, like I said, being a cynic, she had to run as a Democrat. [00:32:40] Right? She started out as a Democrat, but she [00:32:45] curved out a little centralist, uh, ideology. While she was actually a senator, [00:32:50] she was often had a business friendly profile and, and late, like I [00:32:55] said, she switched her registered affiliation from Democrat to independent, even [00:33:00] though she was still caucusing with the Democrats.

She opposed changing or [00:33:05] weakening the Senate filibuster, helping block democratic efforts to pass broad voting rights [00:33:10] legislation. Huh. You know, like what Dr. Martin Luther, the King died for. [00:33:15] And abortion protections, huh? [00:33:20] So first woman Senator outta Arizona, but [00:33:25] blocking abortion protections, definitely not a feminist.[00:33:30]

Um, she helped stall the larger build back better agenda, then [00:33:35] negotiated changes to the scaled down inflation reduction [00:33:40] act, insisting on removing a tax hike on carried interest while [00:33:45] supporting a new tax on stock buybacks. She often [00:33:50] sided with Republicans on business regulation, defense, and some spending [00:33:55] issues, which is why outlets and scorecards consistently described her as [00:34:00] one of the most conservative Democrats, backslash, independents, and Congress.

[00:34:05] Once again, the cynic in me said, well, she had to run as a [00:34:10] Democrat. She's gonna be openly gay, well openly bisexual. [00:34:15] Because remember, she had an affair with a bodyguard. [00:34:20] That's the reason why I'm bringing all this up. It's all connected. I'm just giving you a little bit of her backstory [00:34:25] while I bring back the home record thing, right?

But like I [00:34:30] said, the cynic in me, she had to run as a Democrat. She was not going to win [00:34:35] and become the first female senator from the state of [00:34:40] Arizona. As a bisexual, openly bisexual [00:34:45] Republican was not going to happen. And when she got elected, [00:34:50] she proved who she was, right?[00:34:55]

She didn't seek a second term. She announced that she wouldn't run for [00:35:00] reelection in 2024. After years of backlash from democratic voters and [00:35:05] activists who felt betrayed by her blocking core party priorities, [00:35:10] such as the voting rights and social spending. [00:35:15] Things that Martin Luther the King died for. [00:35:20] It is crazy how she would be one of the [00:35:25] people that's gonna celebrate him on his day, but actively [00:35:30] voted against all of his stuff that he died for, and she ain't [00:35:35] even a MAGA Republican.

You see what I'm saying? It's not just maga, it's the hypocrisy [00:35:40] of people who talk a good game, but don't ever back it [00:35:45] up. Her approval numbers collapsed among Democrats in Arizona, [00:35:50] of course, and she faced the prospect of a brutal three-way waste against a Democrat [00:35:55] and a Republican, which would've likely split the votes and risked an embarrassing loss.[00:36:00]

So she decided not to run. She framed her decision as [00:36:05] rejecting partisan politics and suggested that there's no room [00:36:10] politically for the kind of centralist deal making identity She claimed. But she ain't even [00:36:15] claim that she ran as an openly [00:36:20] bisexual Democrat. That's how she ran. Anybody [00:36:25] seeing that on the scorecard is gonna be like, oh, she's openly bisexual Democrat.

That means she's going to [00:36:30] believe in social programs. She's gonna be a feminist. She's [00:36:35] gonna believe in human rights. She's gonna believe in voting rights. She got into office and didn't do [00:36:40] any of those things. The switcheroo. She did the switcheroo. But I gotta get back [00:36:45] to this lawsuit. So this month in January of our [00:36:50] Lord,

A Senator, a Bodyguard & a Lawsuit That Writes Itself 😱🧳🔥

[00:36:50] Speaker: 2026, she was being sued in federal court by [00:36:55] Heather amlo, the ex-wife assessment's former bodyguard are [00:37:00] the North Carolina's alienation of Affection law.

They're [00:37:05] popularly called. The home record law, that's what I'm gonna stick with. The complainant [00:37:10] alleged assessment knowingly pursued an affair with her husband, a former US [00:37:15] Marshall and security detail member while he was married with three [00:37:20] kids. And that his relationship and that this relationship contributed to the breakdown [00:37:25] of their 14 year marriage.

Alright, [00:37:30] so you got a senator at the time having an affair with her [00:37:35] bodyguard all the while making it harder for people to vote, [00:37:40] eliminating, uh, abortion protections for women. And [00:37:45] she's also having an affair with a man that's supposed to be [00:37:50] protecting her, like the real life movie, the Bodyguard. But she ain't Whitney Houston.

And he ain't Kevin Costner. [00:37:55] Okay. He's got three kids and been married for 14 years. [00:38:00] Y'all don't think this is funny. I think this is absolutely [00:38:05] hilarious. The lawsuit claims that ESMA willfully and [00:38:10] intentionally seduced and enticed him, including alleged [00:38:15] romantic and sexual counters, trips, and even paying for [00:38:20] psychedelic treatment and seeks at least tens of thousands of dollars in [00:38:25] damages.

Now, hold on. Hold on. [00:38:30] We talk about remembering Martin Luther King. We talk about the voting [00:38:35] rats, the civil disobedience, the [00:38:40] Movement for Civil Rights. Krista esma [00:38:45] runs as a democratic candidate, [00:38:50] openly bisexual wins the democratic seat. Then it turns. [00:38:55] Votes against the very principles that Martin Luther the [00:39:00] king, died for all the [00:39:05] while she's enticing [00:39:10] willfully, intentionally seducing her bodyguard [00:39:15] with romantic and sexual encounters.

Remember, she was bisexual, so I wonder what them sexual [00:39:20] encounters was like, okay, look, hey, I want [00:39:25] that's, that's a, that's a way to entice a man just saying [00:39:30] you bisexual and you enticing them and [00:39:35] seducing them with sexual encounters. Come on now. [00:39:40] Not only that, but trips. You flying him out, he being [00:39:45] flown out and you giving him psychedelic treatment.

[00:39:50] I mean, she sound like freak freak. She sound like Adena, [00:39:55] Howards Freak Like Me song was written specifically [00:40:00] for her. Yeah, she turned my man out from the lawsuit. It [00:40:05] looks like she turned my man out. And I'm gonna be real honest if you see it, [00:40:10] Kristen, she ain't, she ain't bad looking. I mean, she look, she [00:40:15] ain't bad looking.

Is it my ideal type? [00:40:20] No. But if I was going to be [00:40:25] willfully and intentionally seduced and enticed by [00:40:30] being flown out for different romantic and sexual [00:40:35] encounters from a bisexual woman, now I'm [00:40:40] not down for no psychedelic treatment. But she, [00:40:45] she, she was doing, she was doing the most. [00:40:50] The absolute most. [00:40:55] This is wild.

And she ain't young either. Like she's only a few years older [00:41:00] than me, like, but she almost 50, right? Like she's still wild. Like [00:41:05] yes, she, she enticed my man. She seduced him. Now, [00:41:10] of course I'm not making her the villain. This is a two party situation. [00:41:15] He ain't had to look. She could have been pressing up on him.

And you can, you got a wife of [00:41:20] 14 years and three kids and if you see a picture of him, he ain't all look, [00:41:25] he ain't all that. Okay. Maybe he thought this was [00:41:30] his shot. He getting flown out from a woman that is obviously [00:41:35] more attractive, like on a scale of one to 10, he's like, and you know, I be [00:41:40] judging harsh harshly, you know, I only give myself a seven.

So it's not [00:41:45] like I put myself in a 10 category. I'd be judging harshly. I'm a seven. [00:41:50] I'm gonna say he a four, and I'm gonna say she's a [00:41:55] better than a four. Right? So maybe he was [00:42:00] like, look, I'm getting flown out. Get these sexual encounters from this bisexual senator, [00:42:05] uh, the first, the first female senator from the state of Arizona.

[00:42:10] I mean, this is monumental. This is historic. And she going to gimme [00:42:15] psychedelic treatments. I mean, he got turned out, but he still, like, [00:42:20] it wasn't like he didn't have a choice, like he's at fault for this too. [00:42:25] She hasn't publicly admitted any wrongdoing. And, you [00:42:30] know, representatives have from our office have declined to comment.

[00:42:35] But like, I've seen certain clips, like they were speaking at some, [00:42:40] you know. Town hall thing in Arizona. And uh, [00:42:45] as he's up there speaking, you can see in the background, she's like, look at my man. I'm proud of my [00:42:50] man. They definitely had an affair. They definitely had an affair. [00:42:55] And it just goes to show you, sometimes you gotta pay attention to [00:43:00] who you elect.

It's not always the [00:43:05] affiliation on that voting ballot. [00:43:10] There's nothing about her voting record who she is as a person. [00:43:15] Well, just because you're a democrat don't mean that you won't have an affair. I, I know a lot of [00:43:20] Democrats that had, you know, affairs and things of that nature, you know, [00:43:25] president Bill Clinton.

Anyway. Um, but the principles that Martin [00:43:30] Luther King died on, she wasn't upholding. [00:43:35] And that's the reason why she switched parties and then tried to say that, you know, she was [00:43:40] stepping down because of partisan politics and that's not what she signed up for. No, [00:43:45] I believe that she knew this was coming down the pike and that this was going to be [00:43:50] damaging to her political career because those trips, her being [00:43:55] him, being her bodyguard, yeah.

There might be some money [00:44:00] that was given or used that was supposed to be used and [00:44:05] you don't want to be investigated by the oversight committee. So [00:44:10] yes, that's, that's what I think. [00:44:15] And I think it's funny, you know, my man's wife, she's gonna get some get [00:44:20] back. She's suing for tens of thousands of dollars. A civil she'll [00:44:25] probably win if she's got a strong case.

If they are together and it's been documented, they're [00:44:30] together. If I was on that jury, I'd have ordered. Because I, yes, [00:44:35] she very much was a response to the [00:44:40] dilution of affection in that marriage. Absolutely. You [00:44:45] can't tell me a man that's been with a woman for 14 years and had three kids with this [00:44:50] woman, did not love and have affection for this woman.

Now, I notice [00:44:55] some people out there will point out that there are absolutely cases where a man would not love a [00:45:00] woman in that scenario, but at some point he absolutely did. [00:45:05] And a dilution of this marriage can be tied to the [00:45:10] super freak of Arizona. The first female [00:45:15] senator outta the state of Arizona, Kristen Sessman.

She is super freak, [00:45:20] just like Rick James said, and Idina Howard freak until the day, until the [00:45:25] dawn.

​

[00:45:35] Speaker: [00:45:30] [00:45:35] We are getting dumber collectively, all of us [00:45:40] getting dumber. When was the last time you remembered a, a ano a phone number? [00:45:45] You remember back in the day, if you are a millennial, maybe, [00:45:50] maybe genzer, like a older genzer, you remember having to remember. [00:45:55] Phone numbers. If you are a Gen X or boomer, like you [00:46:00] absolutely remember, we, we had a whole bunch of numbers in our head.

We had our best friend's phone number. We had multiple [00:46:05] friends, phone numbers, our house phone, emergency numbers.

We’re Getting Dumber — Phones, GPS & Memory Loss 📱🧠⬇️

[00:46:08] Speaker: We knew numbers [00:46:10] in our head. I cannot remember a cell phone number to [00:46:15] save my life. That's an exaggeration. Of course I could, [00:46:20] but you, you know what I mean? Like it is very difficult. We're getting dumber.

Our attention, our short [00:46:25] attention spans and our short-term memory, I [00:46:30] believe are being destroyed, and they're being destroyed by technology because we don't need to have it. [00:46:35] We've got, I've got so many alarms on my phone [00:46:40] to remind me about stuff. Dig this here. And I'm not talking about sleep. I'm not talking about wake up [00:46:45] alarms.

I have alarms on my phone to remember, to remind [00:46:50] me to do certain things. And then I have reminders of those [00:46:55] reminders that are just four to five minutes later, Hey, [00:47:00] don't forget you need to do this thing. And it is daily. [00:47:05] What that does is it makes us lazier. We don't have to [00:47:10] exercise that muscle. The short term memory, we become dumber.

[00:47:15] There are people who drive the same route every day, but they use a [00:47:20] GPS. You take away that GPS, they can't get to the same [00:47:25] place they've been driving every day because they've been relying on the GPS. We're getting dumber. [00:47:30] We're getting smarter and dumber. Like our ability, the kids, the before they could say words, [00:47:35] they know how to work a phone to tablet.

It's remarkable. But there's [00:47:40] also been some studies that kids are learning how to speak slower [00:47:45] than than previous generations. There's a trade [00:47:50] off. There's always a trade off. Why am I bringing this up? Because Matt Damon [00:47:55] was just on the Joe Rogan show. Now I'm not a fan of Joe Rogan. That's popped up in my [00:48:00] algorithm.

And he was talking about how streaming services like [00:48:05] Netflix, call upon creators to [00:48:10] dumb down material because people have short attention [00:48:15] spans. What do I mean?

Matt Damon, Netflix & Dumbing Down Storytelling 🎬📉🤯

[00:48:16] Speaker: So Matt Damon said, Netflix is reshaping [00:48:20] movies to cater to distracted phone, scrolling viewers by [00:48:25] front loading big action and repeating the plot several times [00:48:30] in dialogue.

And he warned that this in fridges on [00:48:35] how stories are being told. Let's break that down. [00:48:40] So typically [00:48:45] you rev up a story. To get to a climax, [00:48:50] but they're adding a climax in the beginning to draw [00:48:55] people in and to stay invested and lead to [00:49:00] another climax at the end. On top of that, [00:49:05] they are repeating the plot and the [00:49:10] dialogue throughout the movie, throughout the television [00:49:15] show because people are watching at home and scrolling on their [00:49:20] phones.

And you know what? They're right because I do it. [00:49:25] I, you know, me and my sister talk about forensic files. It is weird. I will have it on the [00:49:30] background while I'm playing video games, and I miss a lot [00:49:35] because these old TV shows were expecting you to be sitting in front of the [00:49:40] television show with nothing else to distract you.

But the [00:49:45] television show. So of course you would be focused and they wouldn't have to repeat plot [00:49:50] points. That's not the case anymore. You gotta repeat those plot points [00:49:55] because I'm looking at my phone, I'm playing video games, I'm doing something else [00:50:00] while I'm watching something and I miss it. [00:50:05] So yeah, it's catering to me, but it's also [00:50:10] taken away the creative and, and then I think about [00:50:15] that and I think about something like this, a podcast where if you're [00:50:20] watching or you're listening, how I've gotta keep you engaged and this is no [00:50:25] action.

There are no scenes. I got graphics purposely [00:50:30] to keep your eyes focused so that you hear what I'm saying. Right. [00:50:35] And also video titles to let you know, hey, this is what I'm talking about. [00:50:40] If you're watching it, you've seen the graphics. Oh, by the way. This is Bruce [00:50:45] Anthony, or it's Jay Andrea, or it's a guest.

Oh, by the [00:50:50] way, don't forget we got other YouTube. All those graphics are there for a reason. [00:50:55] They have to be there. If you have a show where it's [00:51:00] just you're watching and it's just a person on screen talking, there are no cuts, there's no [00:51:05] nothing, there's no graphics. You are gonna get bored. You're gonna get on your phone, you're gonna do [00:51:10] something else.

You're gonna miss the majority of the information that I'm giving. That's the reason why people joke [00:51:15] on me. They say, Bruce, you repeat yourself a lot. Yeah, I repeat myself to [00:51:20] reiterate the point. 'cause you may have missed it the first time. And [00:51:25] this is crazy that now content creators, not just content, not just [00:51:30] podcasting, or people that create reels on Instagram or [00:51:35] TikTok, because this is the system in which you have to keep people's [00:51:40] attention when you're doing content creation.

I'm talking about long form [00:51:45] content now, right? Matt Damon and Ben Affleck are making movies [00:51:50] and I'll be the first one to tell you. It is very difficult for me to sit down and watch a movie. I [00:51:55] can watch six hours of a docuseries or six hours of [00:52:00] one hour shows. I can not watch two hours of a movie. [00:52:05] It's, it's very, very difficult for me.

[00:52:10] And if the movie is two hours, it takes me two and a half hours to watch it. 'cause I'm gonna pause [00:52:15] it. I'm gonna be on my phone. I'm gonna have to rewind it. The attention span, our attention span is [00:52:20] short. So he, he was [00:52:25] on Joe Rogan's show promoting his new Netflix crime filler The Rip with Ben [00:52:30] Affleck, and he contrasted watching [00:52:35] movies at home.

As opposed to the movie theater. And [00:52:40] yes, when you're at the movie theater, you gotta put your phone away. I'm like, you might get hurt [00:52:45] if you in the movie theater scrolling on your phone. Like, I remember, [00:52:50] I can't remember which movie it was that I went to go see, but maybe it was like a year, year and a half [00:52:55] ago.

I went to go see a movie and these two dudes was just chit chatting. I stood [00:53:00] up and man, hey man, shut the F up. I'm trying to watch this movie now [00:53:05] because I'm 6 4 240 pounds. They shut up. Well, you know, that could have been [00:53:10] an altercation, but the fact of the matter is they were being disrespectful because we're [00:53:15] trying to watch the movie being at home.[00:53:20]

Me and my brother and sister watching Jason State the movies, we're all on our phones. [00:53:25] We're all chitchatting, we're pausing. Remind uh, rewinding. That's what we do. 'cause it's a [00:53:30] home, it's a different level of attention and experience. He was [00:53:35] saying the main points is now the big action set piece is in the first five minutes of an action movie, [00:53:40] so people don't click away instead of the old model, which was a huge [00:53:45] third act climax, right?

He added that Netflix encouraged filmmakers [00:53:50] to reiterate the plot three, four times in dialogues, so people stay focused. [00:53:55] He said, why is this dumbing down storytelling? He said, this [00:54:00] approach is driven by data on short attention spans and retention, [00:54:05] but that it is really going to start infringing on how people tell these stories.

The [00:54:10] implication is that these movies are being simplified and over explained [00:54:15] with louder, earlier spectacle to accommodate distracted viewers rather [00:54:20] than trusting an attentive audience. And they're absolutely right 'cause the audience [00:54:25] isn't attentive anymore. They're not, [00:54:30] and due to technology. I'm not, look, I still don't think [00:54:35] technology is a bad thing, but it is harming us.

It's making us dumber and it's making creators, [00:54:40] people who make iconic films, [00:54:45] it's making them having to change. And as a creative [00:54:50] person, I would hate, even [00:54:55] though sometimes you do have to accommodate what your audience is [00:55:00] going to be for whatever it is that you create. If there ever came a [00:55:05] point in time what I would have to gear this podcast [00:55:10] towards creative principles that I don't agree with, that's the end [00:55:15] of this podcast.

I'm done doing it. I'm done. I [00:55:20] will not, I will not [00:55:25] jeopardize my creative freedom in any way just to placate the masses. [00:55:30] It's been told to me that this show would be more [00:55:35] appealing if I was messier. And that's [00:55:40] just not what I'm into. I mean, I'm a messy individual. I am messy [00:55:45] individual. But I like intellectual messiness, not stupid.[00:55:50]

Throw your brain away, rot, messiness. The show will never become [00:55:55] that. And the moment I even start to lean in that direction, I'm not [00:56:00] talking about a segment here, a segment there of being rot, messiness. Right? [00:56:05] Like, okay, that's cool. But I'm talking about like if that ever became the [00:56:10] show, it Jerry Springer was a serious, a [00:56:15] serious talk show at one point, and it devolved into what it later [00:56:20] became.

I got a lot of respect for Jerry Springer and [00:56:25] everything that he did, but that wouldn't be me. That, that [00:56:30] I won't sell out what I believe in [00:56:35] just to become more popular. I've never believed in doing that. [00:56:40] I understand Netflix said, Hey look man, let's just make a few [00:56:45] adjustments. You could still have the big climatic third act, but let's add [00:56:50] something in that first act.

And oh, by the way, let's keep driving home what the plot [00:56:55] points is. I could do that and still create and still have my creative freedom, but [00:57:00] the moment they start to add more and more restrictions is the moment [00:57:05] where our entertainment is gonna be so watered down that we are no longer [00:57:10] entertained. We won't be entertained anymore.[00:57:15]

And that's a scary world to live in, but it's a world that we've [00:57:20] created, and I'm not a hypocrite. I understand that. I'm [00:57:25] part of the problem. In my personal life, I'm part of that problem [00:57:30] because it is really tough for me to go to movie theaters. It gotta be a special [00:57:35] occasion. I could think in my head the next movies that I'm gonna see in the movie theater, I'm gonna see Super [00:57:40] Girl.

Community, Attention & Putting the Phones Down 🤝📵✨

[00:57:41] Speaker: I'm gonna see Avengers Doomsday, I'm gonna see Spider-Man. [00:57:45] That's it. I'm not going to the movie theaters for anything [00:57:50] else. So I like to be at home. I like to be at home, not only because I [00:57:55] can take pee breaks, 'cause these movies are entirely too long, but also because the movies are [00:58:00] entirely too long. I can't sit still in a seat for that long.

I need to get up, do something. [00:58:05] I need to get on my phone. I have to. And now Netflix is [00:58:10] saying, yeah, I know you. And because I know you, I know that audience [00:58:15] member. I'm gonna need these creatives to write and [00:58:20] create geared towards that audience. And in the process, we are getting watered [00:58:25] down entertainment.

The Days of the Godfather might be [00:58:30] over, might be, but [00:58:35] man, we got a lot more to choose from. And every now [00:58:40] and then, every now and then, like the movie Sinners, you'll get some [00:58:45] original type concept that'll take you by storm. Because [00:58:50] every now and then we do have the attention we do. [00:58:55] We can focus if something is good enough to focus in and hor [00:59:00] in for a good two hours on one thing and enjoy it together as a community because [00:59:05] that's what we do when we go to movie theater, theater.

We [00:59:10] join together as a community, watch something [00:59:15] and enjoy it. Even every now and then, like [00:59:20] when you know, cap Captain America says, you know, Avengers assemble [00:59:25] movie theaters, go crazy. That's community. [00:59:30] Much like the community that Dr. Martin Luther King was trying [00:59:35] to foster and died for. [00:59:40] Just a thought.

Just a thought. [00:59:45] Everything is connected. Let's put down our phones every now [00:59:50] and then and enjoy each other in all our [00:59:55] diversity and all our differences. [01:00:00] Learn and be in community. But on [01:00:05] that note, I want to thank you for listening. I want to thank you for watching, and [01:00:10] until next time, as always, I'll [01:00:15] holler.

[01:00:15] Bruce Anthony: Woo. That was a hell of a show. Thank you for rocking with us here [01:00:20] on Unsolicited Perspectives with Bruce Anthony. Now, before you go, don't forget to follow, [01:00:25] subscribe, like, comment, and share our podcast. Wherever you're listening [01:00:30] or watching it to it, pass it along to your friends. If you enjoy it, that means the people that you rock, we'll [01:00:35] enjoy it also.

So share the wealth, share the knowledge, share the noise. [01:00:40] For all those people that say, well, I don't have a YouTube. If you have a Gmail account, you have a YouTube. [01:00:45] Subscribe to our YouTube channel where you can actually watch our video podcast and YouTube exclusive [01:00:50] content. But the real party is on our Patreon page after Hours Uncensored [01:00:55] and talking straight ish after Hours.

Uncensored is another show with my sister, and once again, [01:01:00] the key word there is uncensored. Those are exclusively on our Patreon page. Jump onto [01:01:05] our website@unsolicitedperspective.com for all things us. That's where you can get all [01:01:10] of our audio video, our blogs. And even buy our merch. And if you really feel [01:01:15] generous and want to help us out, you can donate on our donations page.

Donations [01:01:20] go strictly to improving our software and hardware so we can keep giving you guys good [01:01:25] content that you can clearly listen to and that you can clearly see. So any donation would [01:01:30] be appreciative. Most importantly, I wanna say thank you, thank you, thank [01:01:35] you for listening and watching and supporting us, and I'll catch you next time.[01:01:40]

Audi 5,000 [01:01:45] Peace.