When Local News Dies, Government Secrecy Takes Over | Miranda Spivack
What happens when the people running your city, county, or state realize nobody is paying attention anymore?
Bruce Anthony sits down with veteran journalist Miranda Spivack, author of Backroom Deals in Our Backyards: How Government Secrecy Harms Our Communities and Local Heroes Fight Back. Miranda spent roughly 20 years at the Washington Post and watched local reporting disappear firsthand. But losing a newspaper isn't just about losing high school sports scores. You lose the reporters who sit through boring government meetings, request documents, follow the money, and ask the questions powerful people would rather avoid. And when those reporters vanish, something changes.
The conversation runs from the newsroom to the courthouse to the water authority: secret deals around data centers, government NDAs, contaminated drinking water, dangerous roads, hidden criminal-justice algorithms, and why low-income communities are often the most exposed when government operates in the dark. Miranda also introduces the accidental activists at the heart of her book, ordinary people with no press credentials, no legal team, and no political power, who found something that wasn't right and refused to stop digging.
Underneath it all is one uncomfortable question about democracy: it depends not only on who we elect, but on whether anyone is still paying attention after the election is over.
When Local News Dies, Government Secrecy Takes Over | Miranda Spivack
Summary
When the local newspaper closes, the story doesn't end. It just stops getting told. In Episode 335 of Unsolicited Perspectives, Bruce Anthony sits down with veteran journalist Miranda Spivack, who spent roughly 20 years covering government and corporate accountability at the Washington Post and watched local reporting vanish one town at a time. Their conversation reframes the collapse of local news as a power story rather than a media story: when nobody is left to sit through the meetings, request the documents, and follow the money, the people in power notice that no one is watching.
From there the discussion moves through the machinery of modern government secrecy, the non-disclosure agreements now attached to data center deals, the public records most people never think to ask for, and the communities that pay the highest price when decisions get made behind closed doors. Miranda also introduces the ordinary people at the heart of her book, folks with no press passes and no legal teams who got angry enough to start digging and would not stop. It is a sobering look at what democracy loses when the watchdog disappears, and a practical one about what any citizen can still do about it.
About The Guest
Miranda Spivack is an investigative journalist who spent about 20 years at the Washington Post covering government and corporate accountability. She is the author of Backroom Deals in Our Backyards, which follows ordinary citizens who uncovered buried government dealings in their own communities, and her work centers on the decline of local news, the spread of government secrecy, and the public records tools available to everyday people. Her reporting and her book have earned recognition including the Studs and Ida Terkel Award.
Host Bruce Anthony is the founder of Unsolicited Perspectives, a podcast covering important events and topics shaping today's society.
Key Takeaways
- Losing a local newspaper is not just losing sports scores and community announcements. It means losing the reporters whose job is to watch what government does and notice when something does not add up.
- Recent studies have linked the disappearance of local news to rising corruption, and even to higher costs for communities as confidence in government finances slips and bond ratings change.
- What Miranda has documented herself is a steady rise in government secrecy over the last 20 years, driven in large part by fear.
- Non-disclosure agreements began as a corporate tool but have spread to county commissions, school boards, and deals with data center companies, hiding the terms from the voters footing the bill.
- Data center deals often trade tax breaks and discounted land for heavy demands on local water and power, and the fine print is frequently sealed by an NDA.
- The communities hit hardest by government secrecy tend to be lower-income communities and communities of color, where decisions land hardest and scrutiny arrived last.
- Public records belong to the public. A study or document held up at a city council meeting becomes public immediately, and you are entitled to request it rather than trust the summary.
- Most people underestimate how much power they hold. Officials listen, especially to 50 people rather than two, so organizing and knowing what your tax dollars paid for can change local outcomes.
Quotes
Bruce Anthony: "We lose people whose job it is to pay attention. We lose reporters who know the neighborhoods, understand the history, recognize the people in power, and notice when something doesn't add up."
Miranda Spivack: "When they're not being reported on, it fractures the community. The community looks for other ways to communicate that aren't as verifiable."
Miranda Spivack: "What I have been able to document myself is an increase in secrecy. Why are people keeping secrets? The answer is fear. It's potentially corruption."
Miranda Spivack: "If you go to the city council meeting and they hold up a document and say, 'We have this study,' that becomes public immediately. You don't have to rely on whatever they're telling you it says. You can go get it."
Miranda Spivack: "Anger and frustration really drive them. There's a cliché, 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you,' and it's not turning out to be the case."
Miranda Spivack: "People generally don't have a sense of how much power they actually hold, and that public officials will listen. They will especially listen if there are 50 of you, not two of you. So you need to learn to organize."
#podcast #MirandaSpivack #LocalNews #GovernmentAccountability #GovernmentSecrecy #PublicRecords #Journalism #InvestigativeJournalism #LocalGovernment #Corruption #NewsDeserts #CivicEngagement #Democracy #unsolicitedperspectives
Chapters:
00:00:00 Synopsis: Who Watches Government When Local News Disappears? 👀📰🏛️
00:02:01 What Communities Lose When Their Local Newspapers Disappear 🏘️📰💔
00:06:30 How Craigslist and Amazon Helped Destroy Local Newspapers Online 📉📰💻
00:09:57 How Ordinary Citizens Are Filling the Local Journalism Vacuum 🔍👥📰
00:13:34 How to Separate Real Journalism From Opinion and Online Noise ✅📰🤔
00:16:40 What Government Does When Nobody Is Watching Local Officials 👀🏛️🚪
00:21:41 How Secret Data Center Deals Drain Public Money and Resources 💧⚡🏢
00:23:54 Why Government NDAs Keep Communities Locked Out of Major Deals 🤐📄🏛️
00:26:08 Losing Local News Can Increase Corruption and Public Secrecy 📰💰🚨
00:29:01 Why Low-Income Communities Are Hurt Most by Government Secrecy 🏘️⚖️🔒
00:31:30 Five Ordinary People Who Became Accidental Community Watchdogs 👥🔍
00:33:51 How Firefighter Gear and Forever Chemicals Sparked a Movement 🧑🚒🧪📣
00:36:28 Public Records That Help You Hold Local Government Accountable 📄🏛️✅
00:42:09 The Personal and Financial Cost of Becoming a Community Watchdog 💸😓🔍
00:44:12 Staying Objective After 40 Years of Emotionally Brutal Stories 🧊📰❤️
00:48:06 Local Organizing Gives Ordinary Citizens Real Political Power 👥🗳️💪
00:49:51 Closing: The Truth Is Often Buried Where Nobody Thinks to Look 🔎📄📰
This isn't just content — it's a conversation. Subscribe, hit the bell, and drop a comment. What you think matters here.
Want the unfiltered version? The takes we don't soften, the extra conversations, the real behind-the-scenes?
🔓 YouTube Membership: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL4HuzYPchKvoajwR9MLxSQ/join
💸 Patreon: patreon.com/unsolicitedperspectives
Full episodes, clips, merch, and everything Unsolicited Perspectives in one place:
🌐 www.unsolicitedperspectives.com
See you in the next one. #BlackCulture #BlackPodcast #SocialCommentary #CurrentEvents #PopCulture #Podcast #BlackHistory #Entertainment #relationships
Beat Provided By https://freebeats.io | Produced By White Hot
Thank you for tuning in to 'Unsolicited Perspectives.' We hope you enjoyed this episode featuring unique and authentic views on current events, social-political topics, race, class, and gender. Stay engaged with us as we continue to provide insightful commentary and captivating interviews. Join us on this journey of exploration and thought-provoking conversations, and remember, your perspective matters!
Synopsis: Who Watches Government When Local News Disappears? 👀📰🏛️
Bruce Anthony: What happens to a [00:00:01] community when the [00:00:02] people in power [00:00:03] [00:00:04] realizes nobody is [00:00:05] watching them? [00:00:06] We gonna get into [00:00:07] it. [00:00:08] Let's get it
[00:00:09] [00:00:10] [00:00:11] [00:00:12] [00:00:13] [00:00:14] [00:00:15] [00:00:16] [00:00:17] [00:00:18]
Bruce Anthony: [00:00:19] Welcome. [00:00:20] First of all, [00:00:21] welcome. This is [00:00:22] Unsolicited Perspectives. [00:00:23] I am your host, Bruce [00:00:24] Anthony, here to lead the [00:00:25] conversation in [00:00:26] important events and [00:00:27] topics that are [00:00:28] shaping today's society. [00:00:29] Join the [00:00:30] conversation and follow us [00:00:31] wherever you get your audio [00:00:32] podcasts. Subscribe [00:00:33] to our YouTube channel for our [00:00:34] video podcasts, [00:00:35] YouTube exclusive [00:00:36] content, and our [00:00:37] YouTube membership. [00:00:38] Rate, review, [00:00:39] like, [00:00:40] comment, share. [00:00:41] Share with your [00:00:42] friends, share with [00:00:43] your family, [00:00:44] hell, even share with [00:00:45] your enemies. On [00:00:46] today's [00:00:47] episode, local [00:00:48] newspapers are [00:00:49] disappearing, government [00:00:50] secrecy is [00:00:51] expanding, and [00:00:52] ordinary citizens are being [00:00:53] forced to uncover the [00:00:54] truth on their [00:00:55] own. [00:00:56] But that's enough of the [00:00:57] intro. [00:00:58] Let's get to the [00:00:59] show
Bruce Anthony: [00:01:00] [00:01:01] [00:01:02] [00:01:03] [00:01:04] [00:01:05] [00:01:06] [00:01:07] I've always [00:01:08] had a deep respect [00:01:09] for journalism [00:01:10] because at its [00:01:11] best, journalism is [00:01:12] about searching for truth, [00:01:13] revealing [00:01:14] the truth, [00:01:15] pointing out [00:01:16] hypocrisy, and [00:01:17] standing up for the people who [00:01:18] don't always have the [00:01:19] power or the [00:01:20] platform to [00:01:21] stand up for themselves. [00:01:22] And I [00:01:23] think somewhere along the [00:01:24] way, we've started [00:01:25] confusing [00:01:26] commentary with [00:01:27] journalism.[00:01:28]
Opinion [00:01:29] segments, debates, [00:01:30] and people [00:01:31] arguing their personal [00:01:32] point of view can [00:01:33] be informative [00:01:34] and entertaining, [00:01:35] but that's not [00:01:36] the same thing as [00:01:37] doing the work to uncover [00:01:38] the [00:01:39] facts. True [00:01:40] journalism is not about [00:01:41] finding facts that support your [00:01:42] argument that you [00:01:43] already wanted to [00:01:44] make. It's about [00:01:45] finding the evidence [00:01:46] wherever it leads, and [00:01:47] even when the truth is [00:01:48] uncomfortable, [00:01:49] [00:01:50] inconvenient, or [00:01:51] challenges what you [00:01:52] already believe. [00:01:53] That work [00:01:54] becomes even [00:01:55] more important at the [00:01:56] local level.[00:01:57]
When local [00:01:58] newspapers [00:01:59] disappear, we don't just [00:02:00] lose sports [00:02:01] scores, community [00:02:02] announcements, or coverage of [00:02:03] city council [00:02:04] meetings. We [00:02:05] lose people whose [00:02:06] job it is to pay [00:02:07] attention. [00:02:08] We lose
What Communities Lose When Their Local Newspapers Disappear 🏘️📰💔
Bruce Anthony: reporters [00:02:09] who know the [00:02:10] neighborhoods, understand the [00:02:11] history, recognize [00:02:12] the people in power, [00:02:13] and notice when [00:02:14] something doesn't [00:02:15] add up.
[00:02:16] And when nobody is [00:02:17] paying attention, [00:02:18] entire [00:02:19] communities can be [00:02:20] ignored, overlooked, [00:02:21] or left to [00:02:22] fall through the [00:02:23] cracks. How are [00:02:24] we supposed to [00:02:25] understand people, let [00:02:26] alone empathize with [00:02:27] them, when we [00:02:28] do not truly [00:02:29] know what is happening [00:02:30] in their communities? [00:02:31] How can we [00:02:32] recognize [00:02:33] injustice, corruption, [00:02:34] or [00:02:35] neglect when there is [00:02:36] nobody there to [00:02:37] document it? [00:02:38] For twenty years, [00:02:39] Miranda Speevak [00:02:40] covered government [00:02:41] and corporate [00:02:42] accountability at The [00:02:43] Washington Post.
[00:02:44] During that time, she [00:02:45] watched local [00:02:46] newspapers disappear [00:02:47] one by one [00:02:48] and began asking [00:02:49] a simple [00:02:50] but unsettling [00:02:51] question: [00:02:52] What happens to a [00:02:53] community when nobody is [00:02:54] left to cover city [00:02:55] hall? [00:02:56] What she discovered [00:02:57] led her to ordinary [00:02:58] people who decided [00:02:59] to start asking [00:03:00] questions themselves. [00:03:01] Her book, [00:03:02] Backroom [00:03:03] Deals in Our [00:03:04] Backyards, follows five [00:03:05] people who had no [00:03:06] press credentials, [00:03:07] no legal [00:03:08] teams, no [00:03:09] special access.[00:03:10]
They simply [00:03:11] believed something was [00:03:12] wrong, began [00:03:13] searching for the [00:03:14] answers, and [00:03:15] refused to stop digging. [00:03:16] In this [00:03:17] conversation, [00:03:18] Miranda and I are going to [00:03:19] explore what [00:03:20] journalism is supposed to do, [00:03:21] what happens [00:03:22] when local [00:03:23] institutions are allowed to [00:03:24] operate without meaningful [00:03:25] scrutiny, [00:03:26] and why [00:03:27] ordinary citizens are [00:03:28] increasingly being [00:03:29] forced to [00:03:30] fill the gap [00:03:31] left behind when [00:03:32] reporters [00:03:33] disappear.
[00:03:34] Without further [00:03:35] ado, [00:03:36] journalist, [00:03:37] former Fulbright [00:03:38] Scholar, and [00:03:39] author [00:03:40] [00:03:41] Miranda Speevak [00:03:42] As I said at the [00:03:43] top, I'm here with [00:03:44] Miranda Spivak, [00:03:45] author of [00:03:46] Backroom Deals [00:03:47] in Our [00:03:48] Backyards: How [00:03:49] Government Secrecy [00:03:50] Harms Our Community and [00:03:51] Local Heroes [00:03:52] Fight Back. [00:03:53] Miranda, thank [00:03:54] you so much for [00:03:55] joining the show. We are [00:03:56] gonna be talking about something [00:03:57] that's near and dear to [00:03:58] my heart, and that [00:03:59] is [00:04:00] journalism, and that is [00:04:01] also fighting [00:04:02] for the little [00:04:03] person.
And you [00:04:04] have this book [00:04:05] where you [00:04:06] have five [00:04:07] people [00:04:08] who fought for [00:04:09] themselves, so I'm [00:04:10] really interested to [00:04:11] hear [00:04:12] about that [00:04:13] and just about [00:04:14] [00:04:15] your take on [00:04:16] journalism in [00:04:17] whole. So thank you so much for [00:04:18] coming on the show
Miranda Spivack: [00:04:19] No, well, thanks, [00:04:20] Bruce. It's great to be [00:04:21] here[00:04:22]
Bruce Anthony: I, normally [00:04:23] I start the [00:04:24] show with [00:04:25] saying, "Let's go [00:04:26] back and tell me [00:04:27] about your background and [00:04:28] your childhood and [00:04:29] stuff like that." But [00:04:30] I am going to [00:04:31] steal a line from [00:04:32] one of my favorite [00:04:33] movies called Brown Sugar, [00:04:34] and [00:04:35] in that line, [00:04:36] the, the [00:04:37] journalist would ask [00:04:38] anybody in the music [00:04:39] industry when they fell [00:04:40] in love with music.
[00:04:41] So I'm going to [00:04:42] ask you, Miranda, [00:04:43] when was it that you [00:04:44] fell in love with [00:04:45] journalism?[00:04:46]
Miranda Spivack: Well, that's a great [00:04:47] question, actually. [00:04:48] [00:04:49] So, [00:04:50] I would [00:04:51] have to say [00:04:52] that it was [00:04:53] probably in high [00:04:54] school in [00:04:55] Fairfax County, [00:04:56] Virginia. [00:04:57] And [00:04:58] then not [00:04:59] in college [00:05:00] because I [00:05:01] was like [00:05:02] watching this [00:05:03] profession even then, and [00:05:04] this is [00:05:05] e- eons [00:05:06] ago, [00:05:07] uh, start to [00:05:08] really [00:05:09] decline. And also [00:05:10] my father [00:05:11] was a journalist in [00:05:12] Washington, D.C.,
and [00:05:13] he died when I was a [00:05:14] freshman in college [00:05:15] of a heart attack. [00:05:16] And I just [00:05:17] understood, I think, [00:05:18] just what a [00:05:19] stressful [00:05:20] occupation this could be. So [00:05:21] of course, I thought I [00:05:22] was gonna be a lawyer. [00:05:23] [00:05:24] However,[00:05:25]
Bruce Anthony: So [00:05:26] hold on.
Miranda Spivack: [00:05:27] however. [00:05:28] Okay.
Bruce Anthony: You thought [00:05:29] [00:05:30] journalism was too [00:05:31] stressful, so you [00:05:32] decided, "I'm gonna be a [00:05:33] lawyer." Okay. In [00:05:34] Washington,
Miranda Spivack: Yeah, [00:05:35] well, forget [00:05:36] that too. So what [00:05:37] happened actually was [00:05:38] that I was [00:05:39] between my junior and [00:05:40] senior years of [00:05:41] college, I got a [00:05:42] job on a small [00:05:43] newspaper.[00:05:44]
Had a [00:05:45] great editor. I [00:05:46] probably-- one of the best [00:05:47] editors I've ever [00:05:48] had. [00:05:49] And then I [00:05:50] was like: "Oh man, [00:05:51] this is too much [00:05:52] fun. You know, this is [00:05:53] what I'm gonna do." I, [00:05:54] I was [00:05:55] resisting it, but I'm gonna do [00:05:56] it. So that, you [00:05:57] know, it goes way back. [00:05:58] And I've been a [00:05:59] journalist for [00:06:00] 40-plus [00:06:01] years. Uh, [00:06:02] really never strayed [00:06:03] from the [00:06:04] profession[00:06:05]
Bruce Anthony: Well, w- [00:06:06] you worked for The [00:06:07] Washington Post for [00:06:08] over 20[00:06:09]
Miranda Spivack: Yeah, about [00:06:10] 20.
Bruce Anthony: About 20 [00:06:11] years. And while you were [00:06:12] at The Washington Post, [00:06:13] you saw [00:06:14] local [00:06:15] newspapers start to [00:06:16] disappear.
Miranda Spivack: [00:06:17] Right
Bruce Anthony: [00:06:18] This probably [00:06:19] happened in the late [00:06:20] '90s going into [00:06:21] 2000s when [00:06:22] the internet is, [00:06:23] is, is really [00:06:24] taking shape. I [00:06:25] know living in [00:06:26] the Washington, D.C.
[00:06:27] area, going to the University of [00:06:28] Maryland, [00:06:29] riding the Metro [00:06:30] back and forth, it [00:06:31] was very [00:06:32] easy for me to [00:06:33] get that [00:06:34] Washington Post [00:06:35] before I hop on the Metro [00:06:36] and, and read [00:06:37] it.
How Craigslist and Amazon Helped Destroy Local Newspapers Online 📉📰💻
Bruce Anthony: [00:06:38] When did this [00:06:39] disappearing of [00:06:40] local [00:06:41] newspapers, though, [00:06:42] when did that start to cause [00:06:43] alarm for you?
Miranda Spivack: [00:06:44] Yeah, I think, [00:06:45] I think you're right. I think [00:06:46] it does [00:06:47] coincide a lot [00:06:48] with the growth of the [00:06:49] internet, uh, [00:06:50] the failure, I think, [00:06:51] of news [00:06:52] organizations, including the [00:06:53] Post, to really [00:06:54] understand [00:06:55] what th-this [00:06:56] was gonna mean. [00:06:57] And [00:06:58] then actually [00:06:59] it was [00:07:00] Craigslist that [00:07:01] really killed off [00:07:02] local news because [00:07:03] it sucked up [00:07:04] all the local [00:07:05] ads.[00:07:06]
Uh, [00:07:07] and, and you know those [00:07:08] little classified [00:07:09] ads that you used to see in [00:07:10] newspapers, those were [00:07:11] worth about [00:07:12] $100 a box. I
Bruce Anthony: Oh, [00:07:13] wow
Miranda Spivack: very... [00:07:14] Especially, well, at the [00:07:15] Post, but, you know, [00:07:16] smaller newspapers, but they [00:07:17] were very valuable. [00:07:18] And they were also [00:07:19] a way that [00:07:20] communities communicated, [00:07:21] frankly, with each other.
I [00:07:22] mean, journalists are always [00:07:23] like, "Oh, [00:07:24] advertising," blah, blah, blah. But [00:07:25] actually it's [00:07:26] another... I wouldn't [00:07:27] call it local news, but [00:07:28] it's another form of [00:07:29] local [00:07:30] communication, so you know what [00:07:31] the local [00:07:32] bookstore is doing. They [00:07:33] don't exist [00:07:34] anymore , you know. [00:07:35] Uh, you know [00:07:36] where you could buy [00:07:37] clothes, where you could buy [00:07:38] groceries, [00:07:39] whatever.
And [00:07:40] so [00:07:41] when [00:07:42] Craigslist-- And, you know, the [00:07:43] guy who started that [00:07:44] actually has done a [00:07:45] lot of [00:07:46] philanthropy subsequently for [00:07:47] local news, 'cause I think [00:07:48] he feel, Craig [00:07:49] Newmark feels guilty [00:07:50] about it, but [00:07:51] as opposed [00:07:52] to Jeff Bezos, who [00:07:53] doesn't care. But, [00:07:54] [00:07:55] the, you know, it, I [00:07:56] think it goes back [00:07:57] to the early [00:07:58] 2000s.
The internet [00:07:59] was really starting to [00:08:00] come on and, and you know, I [00:08:01] remember this debate. I was at [00:08:02] the Post starting in [00:08:03] 1998, and there [00:08:04] was a whole [00:08:05] internal debate about [00:08:06] sort of what to do, [00:08:07] and Steve [00:08:08] Call, who was then the [00:08:09] managing editor [00:08:10] and left [00:08:11] kind of, I [00:08:12] think, in frustration, [00:08:13] but he saw it [00:08:14] coming. [00:08:15] And, you know, much as [00:08:16] I love the Graham [00:08:17] family, and I do [00:08:18] respect and admire [00:08:19] them a lot, then I [00:08:20] think that [00:08:21] everybody was a little [00:08:22] behind on this.
And [00:08:23] then, and then when [00:08:24] Bezos bought the [00:08:25] paper [00:08:26] he really started to [00:08:27] diminish the [00:08:28] local coverage, [00:08:29] which [00:08:30] continues now. It's [00:08:31] been eviscerated. [00:08:32] But this is [00:08:33] also playing out [00:08:34] in communities all [00:08:35] around the country. It's [00:08:36] not just the [00:08:37] DC, the DMV, as we [00:08:38] call it. It's not [00:08:39] that. It's really [00:08:40] going on everywhere, and [00:08:41] it's really the loss of [00:08:42] local [00:08:43] advertising and local [00:08:44] businesses.
So [00:08:45] Amazon hits you in two [00:08:46] ways. You know, they [00:08:47] suck up all your [00:08:48] local business. They [00:08:49] took the book [00:08:50] industry. [00:08:51] You can get [00:08:52] anything you want from [00:08:53] Amazon, including [00:08:54] groceries, so why [00:08:55] should I have to go to the grocery [00:08:56] store? [00:08:57] DoorDash, I mean, all [00:08:58] this stuff is, you know, [00:08:59] people are living [00:09:00] on the internet now.[00:09:01]
Bruce Anthony: Yeah, [00:09:02] that's interesting [00:09:03] because I think a lot of [00:09:04] people look at [00:09:05] newspapers [00:09:06] as, uh, [00:09:07] and their source of [00:09:08] revenue as [00:09:09] subscriptions, but [00:09:10] no, it [00:09:11] was ads [00:09:12] and those comm- I [00:09:13] didn't even [00:09:14] think about the [00:09:15] community [00:09:16] advertisements that would [00:09:17] be in the [00:09:18] newspaper for [00:09:19] jobs [00:09:20] or people [00:09:21] selling [00:09:22] stuff. It's [00:09:23] almost as if [00:09:24] [00:09:25] Craigslist, [00:09:26] as you say, [00:09:27] [00:09:28] started [00:09:29] it, but then like the [00:09:30] Nextdoor app, [00:09:31] [00:09:32] where [00:09:33] communities are [00:09:34] literally [00:09:35] speaking to one [00:09:36] another and they're [00:09:37] advertising [00:09:38] what they-- Has gotten rid of [00:09:39] Craigslist.
So [00:09:40] that's another [00:09:41] aspect of that [00:09:42] extension. [00:09:43] H- But [00:09:44] so [00:09:45] when this [00:09:46] is happening to The [00:09:47] Washington Post, [00:09:48] these [00:09:49] local newspapers are [00:09:50] disappearing because [00:09:51] that ad [00:09:52] revenue is [00:09:53] disappearing. What is [00:09:54] happening [00:09:55] [00:09:56] to the local [00:09:57] news [00:09:58] [00:09:59] and the [00:10:00] community at [00:10:01] large when these [00:10:02] newspapers are [00:10:03] disappearing? [00:10:04]
How Ordinary Citizens Are Filling the Local Journalism Vacuum 🔍👥📰
Miranda Spivack: Well, I [00:10:05] mean, and that's sort of what my [00:10:06] book is about too, [00:10:07] because what [00:10:08] happens, [00:10:09] local news, [00:10:10] people see [00:10:11] themselves in the [00:10:12] newspaper, or they see their [00:10:13] neighbors in the newspaper, or they [00:10:14] see high school sports [00:10:15] in the newspaper. [00:10:16] These are all [00:10:17] community unifiers. [00:10:18] You know, [00:10:19] public issues [00:10:20] that are discussed [00:10:21] in the newspaper, [00:10:22] you know, covering the [00:10:23] city council, [00:10:24] uh, the school [00:10:25] board, you know, [00:10:26] public school [00:10:27] issues, whatever.[00:10:28]
So when [00:10:29] they're not being [00:10:30] reported on, I [00:10:31] think it, it, [00:10:32] it fr- it's sort [00:10:33] of a chicken and egg, but [00:10:34] I think it [00:10:35] fractures the [00:10:36] community. The community [00:10:37] looks for other ways [00:10:38] to communicate that [00:10:39] aren't as [00:10:40] verifiable. I mean, [00:10:41] I'm sorry, [00:10:42] but, you know, [00:10:43] all this stuff [00:10:44] on [00:10:45] Facebook and elsewhere [00:10:46] that people post [00:10:47] without even [00:10:48] checking it, [00:10:49] it's-- who [00:10:50] knows, you know, what [00:10:51] is really [00:10:52] true [00:10:53] anymore?
So, which of course [00:10:54] Trump has played [00:10:55] on tremendously. [00:10:56] But, [00:10:57] it, [00:10:58] it just, [00:10:59] it, you know, [00:11:00] community listservs. I [00:11:01] mean, when I went to [00:11:02] research my book, which was [00:11:03] about five local [00:11:04] communities [00:11:05] where the news [00:11:06] organizations are [00:11:07] basically gone [00:11:08] except in one [00:11:09] case, and it's [00:11:10] local people who [00:11:11] step in and [00:11:12] step up and, [00:11:13] and discover a [00:11:14] problem in their [00:11:15] community and go about trying [00:11:16] to solve it, [00:11:17] frankly, without [00:11:18] much media [00:11:19] coverage.
[00:11:20] And, [00:11:21] you know, this [00:11:22] is what's happened, is I [00:11:23] think that [00:11:24] civilians, as [00:11:25] I call them, they're not [00:11:26] lawyers, they're not [00:11:27] journalists, they [00:11:28] they are, [00:11:29] to the extent that they [00:11:30] are able and [00:11:31] have time, they are [00:11:32] stepping in and filling [00:11:33] the void. [00:11:34] But, [00:11:35] you know, they're not [00:11:36] all-- I'm, [00:11:37] I'm not saying that they're [00:11:38] dishonest, but they're [00:11:39] not [00:11:40] verifiable [00:11:41] communicators.
And, [00:11:42] you know, [00:11:43] journalism is a profession [00:11:44] despite what [00:11:45] people think. [00:11:46] And [00:11:47] certainly, you know, [00:11:48] every news organization [00:11:49] I've worked at, which [00:11:50] was local all the [00:11:51] way to national, [00:11:52] we worked [00:11:53] very hard [00:11:54] to be [00:11:55] accurate, and when we made a [00:11:56] mistake, we owned up [00:11:57] to it. And I [00:11:58] think that [00:11:59] doesn't happen now with [00:12:00] all this stuff on the [00:12:01] internet.
So if [00:12:02] you're [00:12:03] somebody [00:12:04] interested in an issue, [00:12:05] you really have to look [00:12:06] long and [00:12:07] hard to find the [00:12:08] truth.
Bruce Anthony: [00:12:09] So,
Researcher vs Journalist: Chasing Truth, Not Your Own Thesis 🔍📝⚖️
Bruce Anthony: uh, [00:12:10] Miranda, [00:12:11] the audience knows [00:12:12] this, but you [00:12:13] don't know this. My first [00:12:14] major at the [00:12:15] University of Maryland [00:12:16] was journalism. [00:12:17]
Miranda Spivack: Oh, well, we won't [00:12:18] hold it against you.[00:12:19] [00:12:20]
Bruce Anthony: I, I, [00:12:21] I loved and [00:12:22] wrote for this [00:12:23] a little while for the [00:12:24] school newspaper at [00:12:25] both in high school and [00:12:26] college. I, [00:12:27] uh, [00:12:28] ended up [00:12:29] being secondary [00:12:30] education and history, but [00:12:31] more importantly, was [00:12:32] a, as a [00:12:33] researcher, those jobs [00:12:34] are researchers, [00:12:35] and it's not [00:12:36] about [00:12:37] [00:12:38] proving your [00:12:39] thesis.
It's about [00:12:40] finding [00:12:41] the truth, [00:12:42] whether the truth [00:12:43] leads you [00:12:44] to back up [00:12:45] what you believed [00:12:46] or sends you down a [00:12:47] path where you're like, [00:12:48] "I was [00:12:49] wrong." And a lot of [00:12:50] people, though [00:12:51] well-intentioned, as you [00:12:52] say, don't [00:12:53] have that [00:12:54] training because it is [00:12:55] absolutely [00:12:56] a profession. [00:12:57] Me as a [00:12:58] researcher [00:12:59] still can't be a [00:13:00] journalist [00:13:01] because there are other [00:13:02] aspects of [00:13:03] journalism that I [00:13:04] did not [00:13:05] learn.
Uh, I [00:13:06] had a problem [00:13:07] when writing of [00:13:08] not having [00:13:09] my [00:13:10] personality come out,[00:13:11]
Miranda Spivack: Mm.
Bruce Anthony: [00:13:12] and they're like, [00:13:13] "You're, you're a [00:13:14] columnist. You're, you're an opinion person. You're-- Yeah,
Miranda Spivack: Yeah, [00:13:15] right. This is a [00:13:16] opinion that's not bad
Bruce Anthony: [00:13:17] you can't, you can't [00:13:18] write just [00:13:19] facts because your [00:13:20] voice always comes [00:13:21] out." [00:13:22] How [00:13:23] can people [00:13:24] that are getting [00:13:25] information from [00:13:26] Facebook, [00:13:27] that are [00:13:28] getting information from [00:13:29] people who aren't journalists, [00:13:30] even the ones that are [00:13:31] on TV that [00:13:32] speak for a living, [00:13:33] how can they [00:13:34] decipher [00:13:35] or research on their [00:13:36] own and find out [00:13:37] what is [00:13:38] truth and what is [00:13:39] opinion?[00:13:40] [00:13:41]
Miranda Spivack: You
How to Separate Real Journalism From Opinion and Online Noise ✅📰🤔
Miranda Spivack: know, [00:13:42] that is a hard [00:13:43] question to [00:13:44] answer, and [00:13:45] the reason [00:13:46] is [00:13:47] that [00:13:48] AI [00:13:49] is taking [00:13:50] over the internet [00:13:51] now. [00:13:52] And [00:13:53] I mean, I've looked [00:13:54] at stuff that I [00:13:55] know [00:13:56] from [00:13:57] either my own work [00:13:58] or experience [00:13:59] or whatever, and [00:14:00] you put it into [00:14:01] AI and it [00:14:02] spits out [00:14:03] gibberish and, [00:14:04] you know, bad [00:14:05] information in, [00:14:06] bad information [00:14:07] out.
It's not [00:14:08] a big mystery why [00:14:09] this isn't working. [00:14:10] [00:14:11] So, you know, [00:14:12] I think [00:14:13] the public [00:14:14] library and the [00:14:15] librarians, frankly, [00:14:16] are great [00:14:17] sources of [00:14:18] how to verify [00:14:19] information and how [00:14:20] to get [00:14:21] information. They also [00:14:22] have access [00:14:23] to [00:14:24] online [00:14:25] databases that [00:14:26] are [00:14:27] fact-based. [00:14:28] And that, you know, [00:14:29] frankly, I would, [00:14:30] you know, [00:14:31] hooray for [00:14:32] librarians.
I mean, I would [00:14:33] go to the public [00:14:34] library, which you can [00:14:35] also reach online [00:14:36] through your [00:14:37] library [00:14:38] card. But, [00:14:39] you know, that's [00:14:40] certainly one way. I [00:14:41] think there are [00:14:42] news [00:14:43] organizations, I would [00:14:44] in particular [00:14:45] point to The New York [00:14:46] Times, that I think [00:14:47] still do [00:14:48] very good [00:14:49] work. I, [00:14:50] you know, full [00:14:51] disclosure, I have [00:14:52] freelanced for them, [00:14:53] but I, I [00:14:54] do think they're a step [00:14:55] above pretty [00:14:56] much everybody else in [00:14:57] this country.
So [00:14:58] yeah, I mean, they are not [00:14:59] perfect, but [00:15:00] they really do... [00:15:01] For example, this [00:15:02] whole story about [00:15:03] Trump's [00:15:04] airplane that [00:15:05] needed to be [00:15:06] retrofitted, which [00:15:07] nobody wanted to [00:15:08] admit why [00:15:09] he wasn't flying [00:15:10] back from the [00:15:11] fancy Qatar [00:15:12] gift plane [00:15:13] from Turkey [00:15:14] and from NATO. Well, [00:15:15] The Times got that [00:15:16] story [00:15:17] and, and [00:15:18] now they're [00:15:19] being sued [00:15:20] basically, or [00:15:21] pur-pursued [00:15:22] by the [00:15:23] administration [00:15:24] because, you [00:15:25] know, obviously it was [00:15:26] based on some kind of [00:15:27] classified information, [00:15:28] or at least secret [00:15:29] information if it [00:15:30] wasn't classified.[00:15:31] [00:15:32]
You know, [00:15:33] that's the reaction of [00:15:34] the government to [00:15:35] truth when [00:15:36] actually The Times [00:15:37] performed a public [00:15:38] service by [00:15:39] alerting everybody to the [00:15:40] fact that this plane [00:15:41] wasn't safe for the [00:15:42] President of the United [00:15:43] States. [00:15:44] Why would you argue [00:15:45] against that? And it [00:15:46] turns out to be true [00:15:47] because, of course, [00:15:48] they're now taking [00:15:49] the plane out of service [00:15:50] and retrofitting [00:15:51] it.
So I [00:15:52] will say, you know, you [00:15:53] have to really [00:15:54] know your [00:15:55] sources. [00:15:56] So I, [00:15:57] you know, I would say The New [00:15:58] York Times is a good [00:15:59] source. I think there are [00:16:00] other good [00:16:01] sources. But also, [00:16:02] you know, trust but [00:16:03] verify. [00:16:04] Go to the [00:16:05] library, talk to-- [00:16:06] get access to [00:16:07] their stuff [00:16:08] and, [00:16:09] and try your [00:16:10] hardest and, you [00:16:11] know, you talk to [00:16:12] people.
I mean, when I-- [00:16:13] I'm a journalist, [00:16:14] I interview people, [00:16:15] but you know what? I [00:16:16] don't take [00:16:17] everything they say at face [00:16:18] value. I [00:16:19] use that as a [00:16:20] opportunity [00:16:21] to look elsewhere [00:16:22] for information. [00:16:23] But it's a, it's a [00:16:24] process, [00:16:25] and certainly sharing [00:16:26] stuff on Facebook [00:16:27] without [00:16:28] verifying it is [00:16:29] just [00:16:30] irresponsible
Bruce Anthony: [00:16:31] Yeah. [00:16:32] Going back to [00:16:33] the loss [00:16:34] of local [00:16:35] news and local [00:16:36] newspapers, [00:16:37] [00:16:38] what, [00:16:39] what happens [00:16:40] in city [00:16:41] government or what does [00:16:42] city government do [00:16:43] differently the [00:16:44] moment they [00:16:45] realize nobody's
[00:16:46] watching, them? [00:16:47] Yeah
What Government Does When Nobody Is Watching Local Officials 👀🏛️🚪
Miranda Spivack: right? [00:16:48] Well, [00:16:49] I mean, [00:16:50] that is a [00:16:51] huge issue [00:16:52] around the country, and [00:16:53] that's why these [00:16:54] accidental activists, [00:16:55] as I call them in my [00:16:56] book, [00:16:57] who become the community [00:16:58] watchdogs, I [00:16:59] mean, they show [00:17:00] up. You know, they [00:17:01] are at the [00:17:02] city council [00:17:03] meetings. And, [00:17:04] and when-- [00:17:05] or they are [00:17:06] asking for [00:17:07] documents and data from the [00:17:08] government, which you're [00:17:09] entitled to get under [00:17:10] most state public [00:17:11] records laws.[00:17:12]
But [00:17:13] when they're [00:17:14] not there, [00:17:15] nobody in the community [00:17:16] knows what's going [00:17:17] on. And when the [00:17:18] local [00:17:19] reporter goes [00:17:20] away or is too [00:17:21] overworked [00:17:22] or is [00:17:23] discouraged from attending [00:17:24] meetings, which [00:17:25] frankly was happening [00:17:26] at the Washington [00:17:27] Post, where I would [00:17:28] just say, [00:17:29] "Oh, come on." You [00:17:30] know, when I go to a [00:17:31] meeting, yes, [00:17:32] 90% of it I'm not [00:17:33] gonna write about.
It's [00:17:34] not interesting to [00:17:35] our readers. But there's [00:17:36] that 10% [00:17:37] that if I weren't [00:17:38] there, I wouldn't [00:17:39] hear. [00:17:40] So, you know, it, [00:17:41] it takes a lot of [00:17:42] legwork to do [00:17:43] this, but this is-- You [00:17:44] know, what's happening is [00:17:45] that [00:17:46] governments know [00:17:47] nobody's [00:17:48] watching, and that's when all the [00:17:49] backroom deals [00:17:50] start to [00:17:51] [00:17:52] un-un-occur[00:17:53]
Bruce Anthony: [00:17:54] Why w- okay. [00:17:55] I [00:17:56] wanna go back [00:17:57] to [00:17:58] specifically The Washington [00:17:59] Post. Why would The [00:18:00] Washington Post [00:18:01] fight against [00:18:02] sending a [00:18:03] reporter to these, [00:18:04] uh, [00:18:05] local town [00:18:06] halls and meetings and [00:18:07] things like that? Is it [00:18:08] purely just an [00:18:09] economic [00:18:10] situation where they [00:18:11] don't wanna [00:18:12] pay, or do [00:18:13] they feel like [00:18:14] that news [00:18:15] isn't important [00:18:16] or isn't [00:18:17] salacious enough to [00:18:18] sell [00:18:19] newspapers?
Why Reporters Sit Through Boring Meetings to Find Big Stories 📝🏛️🔎
Miranda Spivack: You know, [00:18:20] what I'm talking about [00:18:21] really occurred 15 [00:18:22] years ago. I, [00:18:23] I couldn't even talk [00:18:24] to you really about the [00:18:25] current-- the Washington [00:18:26] Post in its current iteration [00:18:27] because [00:18:28] they basically [00:18:29] gutted local news [00:18:30] completely. It was already on [00:18:31] its way out, [00:18:32] but the last [00:18:33] six months [00:18:34] they've laid [00:18:35] off hundreds [00:18:36] of reporters, many [00:18:37] of them on local news.[00:18:38]
So [00:18:39] going back, I [00:18:40] would say 15 [00:18:41] years when people [00:18:42] were [00:18:43] discouraging reporters [00:18:44] from hanging [00:18:45] out with [00:18:46] you know, at [00:18:47] meetings, [00:18:48] I think it [00:18:49] was that [00:18:50] was this the, the best [00:18:51] use of our [00:18:52] time? Was it going to [00:18:53] be salacious [00:18:54] enough? We [00:18:55] don't want meeting [00:18:56] stories in the paper. They're [00:18:57] boring. [00:18:58] Well, you know, I, I [00:18:59] always had a different [00:19:00] view, which [00:19:01] was [00:19:02] you gotta hang out, [00:19:03] you gotta [00:19:04] listen.
You-- I got [00:19:05] one of my best [00:19:06] stories being at a [00:19:07] planning board [00:19:08] meeting about this [00:19:09] fancy [00:19:10] art [00:19:11] gallery, secret art [00:19:12] gallery in, in [00:19:13] Montgomery County, [00:19:14] Maryland, [00:19:15] where, you know, there [00:19:16] was millions of [00:19:17] dollars, [00:19:18] billions probably, [00:19:19] of [00:19:20] ex-exclusive art that wasn't [00:19:21] open to the [00:19:22] public. But the [00:19:23] owner, Mitch [00:19:24] Rales of the [00:19:25] Danaher Corporation, [00:19:26] wanted a [00:19:27] sewer, [00:19:28] so suddenly [00:19:29] he had to go [00:19:30] into the public [00:19:31] domain.
And, [00:19:32] and then, you know, [00:19:33] I wrote about this [00:19:34] guy, and [00:19:35] he actually gave me an [00:19:36] interview, which annoyed [00:19:37] the hell out of our [00:19:38] business reporters who had [00:19:39] tried for years to get [00:19:40] an interview with him, and [00:19:41] he'd never done it. [00:19:42] I said, "Well, I [00:19:43] cover local news. He [00:19:44] wants a sewer. [00:19:45] That's why." [00:19:46] But, you [00:19:47] know, I j- I just [00:19:48] never [00:19:49] a-agreed with that.
I think it [00:19:50] was a time [00:19:51] management thing and [00:19:52] also a [00:19:53] desire for the [00:19:54] big story. [00:19:55] But big [00:19:56] stories come out [00:19:57] of building [00:19:58] little stories[00:19:59]
Bruce Anthony: Right. [00:20:00] Yeah, I always [00:20:01] tell people [00:20:02] when I was [00:20:03] [00:20:04] a student [00:20:05] teacher and I [00:20:06] was teaching [00:20:07] history and people would say, [00:20:08] "History is boring," [00:20:09] I would say, "No, it's not, [00:20:10] because you [00:20:11] love the History [00:20:12] Channel, you love [00:20:13] documentaries." It's just the [00:20:14] way that you teach [00:20:15] history. If you teach it in a [00:20:16] storytelling, [00:20:17] people will, will [00:20:18] be interested in [00:20:19] it.
It, [00:20:20] local [00:20:21] or the s- small [00:20:22] stories [00:20:23] do often turn [00:20:24] into big stories, and you [00:20:25] watch on Netflix [00:20:26] all the time. [00:20:27] It's these little [00:20:28] stories in these little [00:20:29] small towns [00:20:30] that [00:20:31] become these big [00:20:32] documentaries, that [00:20:33] become these [00:20:34] [00:20:35] kind of, [00:20:36] uh, [00:20:37] pop culture [00:20:38] phenomenons, [00:20:39] and it starts [00:20:40] by [00:20:41] local [00:20:42] reporting.
Miranda Spivack: [00:20:43] Right
Bruce Anthony: [00:20:44] [00:20:45] [00:20:46] [00:20:47] [00:20:48] [00:20:49] [00:20:50] [00:20:51] What is [00:20:52] this-- What [00:20:53] is the common thread?
[00:20:54] You've got data [00:20:55] centers, you got [00:20:56] water systems, [00:20:57] you got [00:20:58] courtroom [00:20:59] algorithms, you got [00:21:00] dangerous roads. [00:21:01] What is [00:21:02] all this thread? Is this [00:21:03] all coming out of [00:21:04] these backroom [00:21:05] deals because these [00:21:06] city government [00:21:07] officials are no longer [00:21:08] being watched [00:21:09] because the local, [00:21:10] uh, [00:21:11] reporter isn't there to [00:21:12] watch them?[00:21:13]
Miranda Spivack: I think that [00:21:14] is generally the [00:21:15] case. Uh, [00:21:16] certainly in the case [00:21:17] of data centers, which [00:21:18] are proliferating [00:21:19] all over the [00:21:20] country and [00:21:21] are [00:21:22] generally those [00:21:23] agreements have been [00:21:24] made with state and local [00:21:25] governments [00:21:26] to [00:21:27] give the... [00:21:28] Often they're looking for [00:21:29] tax breaks actually, [00:21:30] which, you know, can really [00:21:31] tick people [00:21:32] off.
So [00:21:33] if your government's gonna [00:21:34] give away a big tax [00:21:35] break or sell [00:21:36] land at a [00:21:37] dis-discount or [00:21:38] whatever to a [00:21:39] data center [00:21:40] that [00:21:41] arguably [00:21:42] uses a lot of [00:21:43] electricity and a lot [00:21:44] of water and [00:21:45] maybe puts too much [00:21:46] stress on the [00:21:47] local [00:21:48] resources, [00:21:49] uh, [00:21:50] [00:21:51] governments
How Secret Data Center Deals Drain Public Money and Resources 💧⚡🏢
Miranda Spivack: might [00:21:52] want to do that [00:21:53] deal behind [00:21:54] closed doors and [00:21:55] often do [00:21:56] because they sign these [00:21:57] non-disclosure [00:21:58] agreements, which are also [00:21:59] proliferating around the [00:22:00] country.
And I'm, [00:22:01] you know, find them [00:22:02] sort of shocking [00:22:03] that [00:22:04] government officials would [00:22:05] agree to that. But what's [00:22:06] happening is these [00:22:07] companies, Amazon, [00:22:08] Microsoft, [00:22:09] uh, all the big [00:22:10] ones are [00:22:11] holding that [00:22:12] over local [00:22:13] governments and saying, "We're not [00:22:14] coming if, if, [00:22:15] uh, you don't [00:22:16] sign this NDA, this [00:22:17] non-disclosure [00:22:18] agreement."
[00:22:19] And [00:22:20] then the [00:22:21] question is, [00:22:22] okay, so you get a [00:22:23] data center, which is [00:22:24] this behemoth, [00:22:25] noisy, [00:22:26] energy-sucking [00:22:27] thing. [00:22:28] Is it producing [00:22:29] enough jobs, [00:22:30] good jobs, [00:22:31] well-paying jobs to make it [00:22:32] worth it? Or is it [00:22:33] sort of like a [00:22:34] warehouse, which, [00:22:35] you know, in Prince [00:22:36] George's County, where I [00:22:37] worked for a long time [00:22:38] for The Post, uh, that [00:22:39] was what was happening [00:22:40] there, is they were just getting [00:22:41] warehouses.
They weren't [00:22:42] getting [00:22:43] well-paying, you know, [00:22:44] jobs. And [00:22:45] so that's sort of the [00:22:46] next question. [00:22:47] If the government is gonna [00:22:48] give away all this stuff [00:22:49] and do it in [00:22:50] secrecy, [00:22:51] what, [00:22:52] what are the people getting [00:22:53] out of it? [00:22:54] And, and that's a lot [00:22:55] of what my book was [00:22:56] about, which was [00:22:57] these secrets [00:22:58] were [00:22:59] being, uh, [00:23:00] [00:23:01] agreed to, whether [00:23:02] it was a non-disclosure [00:23:03] agreement or [00:23:04] a dangerous [00:23:05] road, as you say, and [00:23:06] documents [00:23:07] about [00:23:08] car accidents [00:23:09] and other [00:23:10] data.[00:23:11]
You [00:23:12] know, what's the public [00:23:13] benefit to that? And [00:23:14] that's really the question. [00:23:15] And I think the [00:23:16] hard answer for [00:23:17] governments is, [00:23:18] we don't really [00:23:19] know. You know, we're [00:23:20] just sort of being [00:23:21] held up by these [00:23:22] companies [00:23:23] and, and we're [00:23:24] afraid because if [00:23:25] we turn them [00:23:26] down, [00:23:27] then maybe we are gonna [00:23:28] lose jobs. [00:23:29] And it, it's [00:23:30] very murky.
[00:23:31] And, but the [00:23:32] common thread is that I [00:23:33] think, A, the [00:23:34] government's... [00:23:35] It's easier to do [00:23:36] stuff in secret. You [00:23:37] know? You don't have the [00:23:38] annoying public looking [00:23:39] over your shoulder. [00:23:40] And there's no [00:23:41] question the public [00:23:42] can be annoying, but it's [00:23:43] usually 'cause they're so [00:23:44] frustrated that [00:23:45] they just [00:23:46] lose it. [00:23:47] But, you [00:23:48] know, I, I think [00:23:49] those NDAs should [00:23:50] just be outlawed [00:23:51] across the country, and [00:23:52] then it would be an [00:23:53] equal playing field.
[00:23:54] So if the data center [00:23:55] company wants to come in, no, nobody's gonna sign an [00:23:56] [00:23:57] NDA [00:23:58] with you. You can [00:23:59] stay here or you can go [00:24:00] next door, but nobody's [00:24:01] signing an NDA[00:24:02] [00:24:03]
Bruce Anthony: I, [00:24:04] so these
Why Government NDAs Keep Communities Locked Out of Major Deals 🤐📄🏛️
Bruce Anthony: [00:24:05] NDAs are [00:24:06] recent, right? And [00:24:07] are they [00:24:08] specifically [00:24:09] just for like [00:24:10] local [00:24:11] governments? Do [00:24:12] [00:24:13] state and [00:24:14] federal [00:24:15] agencies also [00:24:16] sign NDAs [00:24:17] with
Miranda Spivack: [00:24:18] Yeah.
Bruce Anthony: [00:24:19] corporations?
Miranda Spivack: Yeah, [00:24:20] yeah. I mean, [00:24:21] what I have [00:24:22] researched and what I [00:24:23] know is state [00:24:24] and local. [00:24:25] There is [00:24:26] you know, [00:24:27] actually the Trump [00:24:28] administration is trying to get [00:24:29] federal employees [00:24:30] to sign [00:24:31] NDAs just so [00:24:32] they won't leak, I [00:24:33] guess. But, [00:24:34] [00:24:35] you know, I can [00:24:36] speak to state and [00:24:37] local really. [00:24:38] They [00:24:39] are proliferating, [00:24:40] and they are being signed [00:24:41] by state [00:24:42] governments, local [00:24:43] governments [00:24:44] small [00:24:45] municipalities.[00:24:46]
And, [00:24:47] you know, these big [00:24:48] corporations are coming in and [00:24:49] saying, " We [00:24:50] want all these things [00:24:51] from you." [00:24:52] and [00:24:53] it's, you [00:24:54] know, "We don't want, we [00:24:55] don't wanna tip off our [00:24:56] competitors." [00:24:57] That's what they [00:24:58] claim is the rationale, [00:24:59] and there's something to [00:25:00] that. I can't deny [00:25:01] that. [00:25:02] But at some point [00:25:03] much earlier in the [00:25:04] process, this stuff [00:25:05] should become public, so [00:25:06] the public has a [00:25:07] chance to weigh in [00:25:08] and say, "Maybe we [00:25:09] don't want that [00:25:10] [00:25:11] [00:25:12] energy-guzzling data center [00:25:13] next door."[00:25:14]
Bruce Anthony: Picture me [00:25:15] naive and the [00:25:16] audience naive. What [00:25:17] is the benefit [00:25:18] for these government [00:25:19] officials to [00:25:20] sign these [00:25:21] NDAs for these [00:25:22] corporate,
Miranda Spivack: yeah. [00:25:23]
Bruce Anthony: corporations?[00:25:24]
Miranda Spivack: it [00:25:25] ranges. [00:25:26] I, I think it can [00:25:27] be that they're [00:25:28] saying, [00:25:29] "We've [00:25:30] brought a lot of [00:25:31] good [00:25:32] jobs to our [00:25:33] community, and thank... [00:25:34] you should be thanking [00:25:35] us." [00:25:36] You know, and then is [00:25:37] somebody putting cash in [00:25:38] their pocket? I [00:25:39] mean, that's [00:25:40] always the [00:25:41] question, it seems to me. What [00:25:42] is the benefit? [00:25:43] Or is it, [00:25:44] uh, a [00:25:45] lobbyist who [00:25:46] takes you on a [00:25:47] fancy boat ride [00:25:48] on, uh, the [00:25:49] s- on the Great [00:25:50] Salt Lake, which somebody [00:25:51] just told me about [00:25:52] yesterday?[00:25:53]
You know, it's [00:25:54] may not be [00:25:55] cash. It could just [00:25:56] be a good [00:25:57] meal. It g- uh, [00:25:58] who knows? [00:25:59] But I [00:26:00] think public [00:26:01] officials, [00:26:02] all of whom are [00:26:03] guided at least [00:26:04] by ethics [00:26:05] laws [00:26:06] and [00:26:07] regulations, just [00:26:08] need to [00:26:09] feel more [00:26:10] comfortable turning [00:26:11] down this stuff [00:26:12] because they are [00:26:13] representing [00:26:14] their communities. [00:26:15] They're not [00:26:16] representing Amazon[00:26:17]
Bruce Anthony: [00:26:18] Mm-hmm.
Losing Local News Can Increase Corruption and Public Secrecy 📰💰🚨
Bruce Anthony: These type [00:26:19] of things have [00:26:20] been happening though. [00:26:21] Like we could go all the [00:26:22] way back to, to [00:26:23] Tammany Hall, [00:26:24] right? And the [00:26:25] corruption that was there. [00:26:26] It, it, [00:26:27] it... I [00:26:28] don't know if you [00:26:29] have [00:26:30] data [00:26:31] one way or the other. [00:26:32] [00:26:33] Can you [00:26:34] pinpoint an [00:26:35] increase [00:26:36] [00:26:37] of [00:26:38] these, [00:26:39] these type of, [00:26:40] I don't know if it's [00:26:41] completely corruption, but [00:26:42] definitely on a [00:26:43] borderline type of [00:26:44] government, local [00:26:45] government corruption [00:26:46] since the [00:26:47] local [00:26:48] reporter and the local [00:26:49] newspapers have disappeared.[00:26:50]
Is there [00:26:51] an uptick [00:26:52] or [00:26:53] is it just [00:26:54] this is the way it's [00:26:55] always been, [00:26:56] maybe people's [00:26:57] eyes are open a little bit [00:26:58] more
Miranda Spivack: Yeah, [00:26:59] very good [00:27:00] question. [00:27:01] [00:27:02] I don't have [00:27:03] data of my [00:27:04] own, but there have [00:27:05] been some recent [00:27:06] studies that have [00:27:07] come out and [00:27:08] shown that when [00:27:09] local news [00:27:10] disappears, [00:27:11] corruption [00:27:12] of one sort or [00:27:13] another [00:27:14] rises. And [00:27:15] also that [00:27:16] [00:27:17] costs to [00:27:18] governments rise [00:27:19] because [00:27:20] their bond [00:27:21] ratings [00:27:22] change, uh, for some [00:27:23] reason. There's [00:27:24] skepticism [00:27:25] about [00:27:26] how [00:27:27] reliable [00:27:28] their [00:27:29] finances are.[00:27:30]
[00:27:31] So, you know, there's a [00:27:32] cost that way, [00:27:33] uh, according to [00:27:34] these studies, [00:27:35] and there's also, [00:27:36] [00:27:37] uh, you [00:27:38] know, some kind of [00:27:39] increase in corruption. What I [00:27:40] have been able to [00:27:41] document [00:27:42] myself is an [00:27:43] increase in [00:27:44] secrecy. That, I [00:27:45] think, has gotten [00:27:46] worse over [00:27:47] the last 20 [00:27:48] years or so. [00:27:49] And [00:27:50] so what does that [00:27:51] mean? Why are people [00:27:52] keeping secrets?
[00:27:53] Which is exactly what [00:27:54] you asked me. [00:27:55] And, and the [00:27:56] answer is [00:27:57] fear. [00:27:58] It's [00:27:59] potentially [00:28:00] corruption. [00:28:01] It's, [00:28:02] [00:28:03] just the [00:28:04] difficulty of [00:28:05] having to deal with the [00:28:06] public when you are [00:28:07] [00:28:08] under-resourced, which most state-- [00:28:09] most local [00:28:10] governments are, because [00:28:11] state legislatures [00:28:12] don't pony up [00:28:13] enough money for them [00:28:14] usually.
Bruce Anthony: Mm-hmm. [00:28:15]
Miranda Spivack: You know, it's a [00:28:16] combination of [00:28:17] factors, but the bottom [00:28:18] line is that [00:28:19] governments lo- state and local [00:28:20] governments usually go [00:28:21] into a defensive [00:28:22] crouch, and it's [00:28:23] just easier to [00:28:24] push the public [00:28:25] away.
It's [00:28:26] easier not to give out [00:28:27] documents and then [00:28:28] have a member of the [00:28:29] public fight back as [00:28:30] opposed to [00:28:31] giving out [00:28:32] something [00:28:33] incorrectly and then getting sued [00:28:34] for it. I mean, a [00:28:35] lot of it is fear, [00:28:36] I think, [00:28:37] but it doesn't [00:28:38] help, and it [00:28:39] doesn't help, [00:28:40] uh, [00:28:41] communities [00:28:42] understand [00:28:43] what's going on in their [00:28:44] communities and [00:28:45] mount a [00:28:46] campaign either to [00:28:47] support it or [00:28:48] oppose it.
W- you [00:28:49] know, without [00:28:50] information, you're [00:28:51] stuck
Bruce Anthony: Yeah. [00:28:52] Speaking [00:28:53] of communities, [00:28:54] it, it seems [00:28:55] like [00:28:56] there might be [00:28:57] a little bit of a [00:28:58] correlation between the [00:28:59] communities that are hit [00:29:00] hardest when [00:29:01] local press [00:29:02] disappears [00:29:03] and [00:29:04] those communities [00:29:05] usually being the [00:29:06] ones that have the least [00:29:07] power to fight [00:29:08] back.
is this [00:29:09] coincidence [00:29:10] or is this by [00:29:11] design?
Why Low-Income Communities Are Hurt Most by Government Secrecy 🏘️⚖️🔒
Miranda Spivack: [00:29:12] Well, [00:29:13] God, it's probably [00:29:14] both. [00:29:15] [00:29:16] I think that is [00:29:17] absolutely true. One [00:29:18] of the communities in [00:29:19] my book is [00:29:20] Uniontown, Alabama, which [00:29:21] is an historically [00:29:22] Black community. [00:29:23] Very, [00:29:24] uh, [00:29:25] you know, low [00:29:26] [00:29:27] employment, low [00:29:28] income, you [00:29:29] name it. Uh, [00:29:30] has [00:29:31] a big catfish [00:29:32] plant there, and [00:29:33] that is a source [00:29:34] of jobs, no [00:29:35] question about it.[00:29:36]
And the [00:29:37] catfish plant is [00:29:38] one of the, what [00:29:39] I would say over [00:29:40] users, the [00:29:41] community would say [00:29:42] polluters, [00:29:43] of the water and [00:29:44] sewer system. [00:29:45] And they [00:29:46] have been cited [00:29:47] for it, but they [00:29:48] usually get a slap on [00:29:49] the wrist [00:29:50] and, and it's [00:29:51] not a big fine, [00:29:52] and as a percentage [00:29:53] of their [00:29:54] costs and [00:29:55] income, it's not a [00:29:56] lot. And [00:29:57] so this [00:29:58] con-continues.[00:29:59]
[00:30:00] And when the [00:30:01] community members there [00:30:02] have tried to speak [00:30:03] up, they have been [00:30:04] shut down [00:30:05] at every [00:30:06] turn, either by the [00:30:07] federal government, which is [00:30:08] funding some of [00:30:09] the cha- [00:30:10] improvements [00:30:11] supposedly, or [00:30:12] by the state [00:30:13] government, which, you know, [00:30:14] they go to [00:30:15] Montgomery to [00:30:16] try to lobby [00:30:17] themselves and, [00:30:18] and can't even get a [00:30:19] moment to speak at a [00:30:20] public meeting.[00:30:21]
Uh, you know, [00:30:22] it's a, it's a mix, [00:30:23] but I would say [00:30:24] that [00:30:25] low-income [00:30:26] communities of color, [00:30:27] which aren't necessarily the [00:30:28] same,
[00:30:29] um, [00:30:30] are [00:30:31] harmed a [00:30:32] lot by the [00:30:33] secrecy. [00:30:34] And it is... [00:30:35] [00:30:36] You know, [00:30:37] I-- It's [00:30:38] interesting. I, [00:30:39] I, [00:30:40] I theorize a [00:30:41] little bit [00:30:42] myself [00:30:43] because I worked in, as a [00:30:44] white person in [00:30:45] Prince George's County, [00:30:46] Maryland, which is a [00:30:47] majority Black [00:30:48] community, majority [00:30:49] minority [00:30:50] community, that [00:30:51] there [00:30:52] is a lot of [00:30:53] residual [00:30:54] [00:30:55] hesitation [00:30:56] about speaking up [00:30:57] and that it goes [00:30:58] way back.
I mean, [00:30:59] it goes back, [00:31:00] you know, to Jim [00:31:01] Crow and that [00:31:02] these, some of the [00:31:03] folks [00:31:04] living there who I would [00:31:05] write about [00:31:06] or interact with [00:31:07] in the government are, [00:31:08] [00:31:09] are-- [00:31:10] don't [00:31:11] see their role or [00:31:12] they're afraid of [00:31:13] being shut down. [00:31:14] Whereas in a [00:31:15] white community or a [00:31:16] more white community [00:31:17] like Montgomery County, [00:31:18] Maryland, [00:31:19] across the way, not too [00:31:20] far away, [00:31:21] [00:31:22] [00:31:23] uh, community [00:31:24] activism [00:31:25] is [00:31:26] sort of [00:31:27] par for the [00:31:28] course, [00:31:29] and people are accustomed [00:31:30] to it, and they believe [00:31:31] they have a voice.
And, [00:31:32] you know, I-- [00:31:33] This is [00:31:34] total theory, and I [00:31:35] haven't [00:31:36] documented it. It's just a gut [00:31:37] feeling based on what [00:31:38] I saw
Bruce Anthony: [00:31:39] Yeah. [00:31:40] Let's
Five Ordinary People Who Became Accidental Community Watchdogs 👥🔍✊
Bruce Anthony: get to your [00:31:41] book. Let's get [00:31:42] to-- Let's-- We've [00:31:43] been talking about your book. Let, [00:31:44] let's get more in [00:31:45] depth about your [00:31:46] book. [00:31:47] [00:31:48] You've said it [00:31:49] that the [00:31:50] people in your book had [00:31:51] no credentials. [00:31:52] They weren't [00:31:53] lawyers. They didn't have any [00:31:54] press pass before [00:31:55] they [00:31:56] went out to start [00:31:57] to get proof. [00:31:58] [00:31:59] What did that ac- [00:32:00] what did that [00:32:01] feeling actually [00:32:02] feel like for them [00:32:03] while they were in that [00:32:04] process?
Miranda Spivack: Yeah. [00:32:05] It's a tough [00:32:06] process. It's, [00:32:07] [00:32:08] first of all, [00:32:09] I mean, and you [00:32:10] mentioned the, some of the [00:32:11] issues. It was, you [00:32:12] know, f- uh, [00:32:13] poison drinking [00:32:14] water, of [00:32:15] dangerous roads. These [00:32:16] are everyday [00:32:17] issues that I think [00:32:18] every community might [00:32:19] encounter. [00:32:20] Toxins [00:32:21] in firefighter [00:32:22] turnout gear, [00:32:23] hidden algorithms in [00:32:24] the criminal justice [00:32:25] system which are being [00:32:26] widely used and [00:32:27] abused, [00:32:28] and [00:32:29] as I said, the [00:32:30] sewer system [00:32:31] in Uniontown, [00:32:32] Alabama.
[00:32:33] And what happens [00:32:34] is [00:32:35] that [00:32:36] people in the [00:32:37] community, [00:32:38] either it happens to-- [00:32:39] something has happened to [00:32:40] them, which is [00:32:41] the case of the [00:32:42] poison drinking water. [00:32:43] Michael Hickey's [00:32:44] father died of a [00:32:45] weird form of [00:32:46] cancer, and [00:32:47] he [00:32:48] just began [00:32:49] researching this. He was [00:32:50] so bereft. This is [00:32:51] in Hoosick Falls, New [00:32:52] York, a small [00:32:53] community outside of [00:32:54] Albany.
[00:32:55] And he [00:32:56] discovers, [00:32:57] he's able to [00:32:58] discover that there are, [00:32:59] uh, forever chemicals [00:33:00] in the drinking water, [00:33:01] and he's able to [00:33:02] trace it back. It takes a [00:33:03] long time. [00:33:04] And what happened to [00:33:05] Michael was [00:33:06] initially, you know, [00:33:07] he was very [00:33:08] cautious, and he wanted [00:33:09] documentation and [00:33:10] proof. And [00:33:11] when he went to the [00:33:12] mayor, the mayor said, [00:33:13] "Oh, don't tell [00:33:14] anybody because [00:33:15] it's gonna give our [00:33:16] community a bad [00:33:17] reputation."
Of course, if you [00:33:18] allow people to move [00:33:19] into the community and they [00:33:20] discover there's poison [00:33:21] drinking water, [00:33:22] that would be a lot [00:33:23] more serious, it seems to [00:33:24] me, than a bad [00:33:25] reputation. But [00:33:26] so [00:33:27] he got pushed back [00:33:28] that way. When he [00:33:29] eventually was able to [00:33:30] prove his point, [00:33:31] which he did [00:33:32] by getting the water [00:33:33] tested [00:33:34] himself and then [00:33:35] also learning to use [00:33:36] public records [00:33:37] and getting [00:33:38] documents and data that [00:33:39] showed that the state [00:33:40] of New York was [00:33:41] aware of this problem [00:33:42] long before they went [00:33:43] public with it.[00:33:44]
But [00:33:45] you [00:33:46] know, it was [00:33:47] unpleasant. I mean, on the [00:33:48] one hand, people [00:33:49] was-- the mayor was [00:33:50] saying, "Don't tell anybody," and [00:33:51] on the other hand, [00:33:52] when the neighbors found [00:33:53] out what he [00:33:54] knew, they said, [00:33:55] "Why didn't you tell us [00:33:56] sooner?" [00:33:57] Uh, which is [00:33:58] understandable, but [00:33:59] it, you know, [00:34:00] it just, it's [00:34:01] very
How Firefighter Gear and Forever Chemicals Sparked a Movement 🧑🚒🧪📣
Miranda Spivack: tough. Or [00:34:02] Diane Cotter, who's [00:34:03] another forever [00:34:04] chemical person.
[00:34:05] Her-- From [00:34:06] Worcester, Mass. [00:34:07] Her, uh, husband got [00:34:08] prostate cancer. He [00:34:09] was a [00:34:10] firefighter. She [00:34:11] began to, [00:34:12] through a very long [00:34:13] process of [00:34:14] research, and she's a high [00:34:15] school graduate, no [00:34:16] experience at all [00:34:17] doing this, [00:34:18] [00:34:19] began to [00:34:20] recognize [00:34:21] that there was-- [00:34:22] were forever chemicals [00:34:23] in firefighter [00:34:24] protective gear, and that it [00:34:25] was conceivable, [00:34:26] still not [00:34:27] proven, that the [00:34:28] gear that was supposed to [00:34:29] protect them was [00:34:30] actually also one [00:34:31] of the many sources of [00:34:32] poisons that [00:34:33] firefighters [00:34:34] encounter.
I mean, going [00:34:35] into a burning [00:34:36] building, you're gonna [00:34:37] inhale a lot of junk, [00:34:38] and it's da- a [00:34:39] dangerous job, and the [00:34:40] rate of cancer [00:34:41] in the fire service is [00:34:42] higher than [00:34:43] the general [00:34:44] population. [00:34:45] But she [00:34:46] took enormous [00:34:47] amounts of grief [00:34:48] from the [00:34:49] industry, from the [00:34:50] union, until the union [00:34:51] finally came [00:34:52] around to her side, [00:34:53] and [00:34:54] public officials [00:34:55] wouldn't give her the time of [00:34:56] day and, you know, [00:34:57] really [00:34:58] labored [00:34:59] alone for a long [00:35:00] time.
There were [00:35:01] also, there was also [00:35:02] competition with [00:35:03] other people who were [00:35:04] discovering similar [00:35:05] problems, and then who was [00:35:06] gonna get the credit, and [00:35:07] just kinda [00:35:08] ugly stuff. [00:35:09] And, [00:35:10] and I [00:35:11] think that, you know, [00:35:12] you have to [00:35:13] be a certain [00:35:14] personality, which is you have [00:35:15] to be angry [00:35:16] because you're getting [00:35:17] rebuffed. You have to [00:35:18] be really [00:35:19] tenacious.
[00:35:20] You have to really [00:35:21] understand, as [00:35:22] all these people did, how [00:35:23] to do [00:35:24] research. Huge, [00:35:25] huge. I mean, Diane [00:35:26] was reading, and [00:35:27] Michael were both [00:35:28] reading, [00:35:29] uh, [00:35:30] chemical studies, you [00:35:31] know, in, [00:35:32] in very [00:35:33] complicated [00:35:34] language that they learned [00:35:35] to decipher. [00:35:36] And then you [00:35:37] have to learn to [00:35:38] organize your community, [00:35:39] which ultimately they [00:35:40] have done, [00:35:41] and, [00:35:42] uh, and learn to [00:35:43] lobby and learn, you know, [00:35:44] the value of public [00:35:45] shaming, which is [00:35:46] where local news [00:35:47] comes in.
If you can't [00:35:48] get somebody to cover [00:35:49] this [00:35:50] and embarrass the [00:35:51] public officials who've been [00:35:52] ignoring this [00:35:53] problem [00:35:54] what do you [00:35:55] have? But, you know, [00:35:56] Diane used [00:35:57] Facebook [00:35:58] not so much [00:35:59] to get the word [00:36:00] out about what her [00:36:01] findings were, but [00:36:02] as a communication [00:36:03] tool. I mean, she sent [00:36:04] 22,000 [00:36:05] emails over [00:36:06] time [00:36:07] to various [00:36:08] public officials [00:36:09] and firefighters [00:36:10] and, you know, began [00:36:11] to build a movement.
And [00:36:12] actually, [00:36:13] that one's been [00:36:14] relatively successful. A [00:36:15] lot of cities [00:36:16] and communities are [00:36:17] now trying to [00:36:18] buy gear that does not [00:36:19] have forever [00:36:20] chemicals in it, but is [00:36:21] still going to [00:36:22] protect firefighters[00:36:23]
Bruce Anthony: You said [00:36:24] a lot of the [00:36:25] people, or, or at least [00:36:26] two of them that you [00:36:27] mentioned, got [00:36:28] access to [00:36:29] public rep- [00:36:30] records. Does the [00:36:31] public [00:36:32] technically have [00:36:33] access to the [00:36:34] records that, that [00:36:35] they can hold [00:36:36] the government [00:36:37] accountable?
Miranda Spivack: [00:36:38] Th-
Public Records That Help You Hold Local Government Accountable 📄🏛️✅
Miranda Spivack: yes, [00:36:39] and this is actually [00:36:40] a big part of the [00:36:41] last chapter of the [00:36:42] book, which is sort of a [00:36:43] how-to chapter [00:36:44] called "The Playbook for [00:36:45] Accidental Activists." [00:36:46] And I talk a [00:36:47] lot about public [00:36:48] records. I think what [00:36:49] happens, what I've [00:36:50] discovered, [00:36:51] as a journalist, I [00:36:52] know how [00:36:53] to do this, and [00:36:54] it certainly was part of [00:36:55] my work over [00:36:56] time.
[00:36:57] But most [00:36:58] people [00:36:59] don't, and they don't [00:37:00] realize that if you go [00:37:01] to the city council [00:37:02] meeting and they hold up a [00:37:03] document and [00:37:04] they're, say, "We [00:37:05] have this study," [00:37:06] that [00:37:07] becomes public [00:37:08] immediately. You [00:37:09] can get that. You [00:37:10] should get that. You don't [00:37:11] have to rely on [00:37:12] whatever they're telling you [00:37:13] it says. You can [00:37:14] go get it.[00:37:15]
[00:37:16] Contracts, you [00:37:17] know, police [00:37:18] reports, I mean, [00:37:19] all of this [00:37:20] stuff is, [00:37:21] should be [00:37:22] available to the [00:37:23] public. [00:37:24] Citations by [00:37:25] environmental [00:37:26] agencies against, [00:37:27] you know, [00:37:28] various [00:37:29] polluters. Those things [00:37:30] are public. You [00:37:31] have to know where [00:37:32] to get them, and [00:37:33] you have to figure out how [00:37:34] to ask for them. [00:37:35] But in [00:37:36] general, every s- [00:37:37] every state, [00:37:38] territory, you name it, and the [00:37:39] federal government have [00:37:40] public records laws.[00:37:41]
And they, [00:37:42] the [00:37:43] advice to governments [00:37:44] by the [00:37:45] law is to err [00:37:46] on the side of [00:37:47] transparency
Bruce Anthony: [00:37:48] [00:37:49] Hmm. I wanna talk [00:37:50] about the [00:37:51] people in your [00:37:52] book [00:37:53] and [00:37:54] accessing of these [00:37:55] records [00:37:56] because [00:37:57] I talk to a lot [00:37:58] of people [00:37:59] just in my personal [00:38:00] life, and [00:38:01] they're always [00:38:02] coming to me, [00:38:03] "Hey, Bruce, did you hear [00:38:04] about this story? [00:38:05] Did you hear about [00:38:06] this? Did you hear about [00:38:07] that?" And, and [00:38:08] me being the [00:38:09] natural, the [00:38:10] naturally [00:38:11] wanting to [00:38:12] question everything [00:38:13] person that I [00:38:14] am would say, "Well, that doesn't [00:38:15] sound right. [00:38:16] [00:38:17] What did the article [00:38:18] say? What'd this [00:38:19] news report say?" "Oh, I [00:38:20] don't know. I just read the [00:38:21] headline." [00:38:22] What type of a [00:38:23] person [00:38:24] [00:38:25] is a person that [00:38:26] will go [00:38:27] and search [00:38:28] out these records, that [00:38:29] will go and [00:38:30] read these [00:38:31] complex documents when [00:38:32] they only have a high school [00:38:33] education, [00:38:34] [00:38:35] go through it, [00:38:36] figure out what [00:38:37] it's trying to say, [00:38:38] learn from it, [00:38:39] and keep [00:38:40] on digging?
Because [00:38:41] it seems [00:38:42] like [00:38:43] [00:38:44] as [00:38:45] technology grows, [00:38:46] we are [00:38:47] becoming more and more [00:38:48] dependent on [00:38:49] technology and becoming [00:38:50] lazier and lazier or [00:38:51] doing the things that [00:38:52] we actually do. People [00:38:53] all the time say, "I read a [00:38:54] book." No, you [00:38:55] listened to a [00:38:56] book. You didn't actually [00:38:57] read the book. So [00:38:58] what type of person [00:38:59] is it [00:39:00] that will go [00:39:01] these [00:39:02] documents and keep on [00:39:03] fighting?[00:39:04]
Miranda Spivack: You know, I [00:39:05] don't think these [00:39:06] people knew that they [00:39:07] were any [00:39:08] particular type of [00:39:09] person at the outset [00:39:10] of their [00:39:11] discovery of problems in [00:39:12] their community. [00:39:13] But, [00:39:14] but [00:39:15] as I [00:39:16] watched their stories [00:39:17] unfold, and a lot [00:39:18] of this I cover- [00:39:19] I watched [00:39:20] o- as it was [00:39:21] occurring and, you know, [00:39:22] sort of [00:39:23] [00:39:24] wondering how these [00:39:25] problems were gonna [00:39:26] be resolved, and [00:39:27] that's [00:39:28] pretty much what the book is [00:39:29] about.
And in the [00:39:30] case of [00:39:31] Uniontown, Alabama, the [00:39:32] problems still are not [00:39:33] resolved, [00:39:34] and I had to sort of [00:39:35] leave that chapter [00:39:36] hanging because it, [00:39:37] you know... [00:39:38] [00:39:39] I [00:39:40] think [00:39:41] anger [00:39:42] is a big driver [00:39:43] here. And I [00:39:44] think the [00:39:45] minute you get [00:39:46] pushback from [00:39:47] either a local [00:39:48] company or, you [00:39:49] know, [00:39:50] you are on hold [00:39:51] for three hours [00:39:52] trying to solve a [00:39:53] problem or [00:39:54] whatever, you [00:39:55] begin to think [00:39:56] the system is [00:39:57] completely messed [00:39:58] up.
[00:39:59] And [00:40:00] when I [00:40:01] went to [00:40:02] the city clerk's [00:40:03] office and I said, [00:40:04] "I wanna see the [00:40:05] contract that [00:40:06] you have [00:40:07] with [00:40:08] so and so [00:40:09] who's picking up my [00:40:10] trash, except they're not [00:40:11] picking it up," [00:40:12] [00:40:13] uh, and you- [00:40:14] you're told, "Oh, it's [00:40:15] gonna take months to dig [00:40:16] out that contract," which [00:40:17] of course is [00:40:18] illegal because [00:40:19] the [00:40:20] maximum state [00:40:21] response is [00:40:22] 30 days.
The [00:40:23] federal response is 20, and [00:40:24] a lot of [00:40:25] communities [00:40:26] and cities and [00:40:27] states w- have to [00:40:28] respond in 10 days. [00:40:29] Doesn't mean they have to [00:40:30] give you what you're [00:40:31] asking for, but at least they have [00:40:32] to acknowledge that [00:40:33] you have made a request [00:40:34] and that they're trying to [00:40:35] fulfill it.[00:40:36]
But [00:40:37] I think, I [00:40:38] think anger and [00:40:39] frustration really [00:40:40] drive them and, and they're [00:40:41] also...
You know, there's [00:40:42] a cliché, "I'm [00:40:43] from the government, and I'm here [00:40:44] to help you," and [00:40:45] it's not turning out to [00:40:46] be the case. And [00:40:47] I think people are [00:40:48] a little surprised [00:40:49] by that and, [00:40:50] and [00:40:51] [00:40:52] turn out to be [00:40:53] crusaders in a [00:40:54] way that they [00:40:55] never even knew they [00:40:56] had it in them. [00:40:57] And, and I th- I [00:40:58] think it's, uh, an [00:40:59] evolutionary [00:41:00] process for people.[00:41:01]
I hope the last [00:41:02] chapter of my-- I mean, the [00:41:03] stories in my book I think [00:41:04] explain this all, [00:41:05] but the [00:41:06] last chapter in [00:41:07] particular, if you were to [00:41:08] scroll to that, you would [00:41:09] say, "Okay, do [00:41:10] this, this, this and [00:41:11] this, and this is how you [00:41:12] can do it."
Bruce Anthony: [00:41:13] Mm-hmm.
Bruce Anthony: [00:41:14] [00:41:15] [00:41:16] [00:41:17] [00:41:18] [00:41:19] [00:41:20] [00:41:21] What [00:41:22] is the toll it [00:41:23] takes,
Miranda Spivack: Yeah. [00:41:24] Hi.
Bruce Anthony: [00:41:25] this fight that [00:41:26] they Yeah. go [00:41:27] through, what is the toll it [00:41:28] takes on them [00:41:29] yeah. It, [00:41:30] it's, it's a lot. [00:41:31] I would [00:41:32] be, [00:41:33] uh, [00:41:34] lying if [00:41:35] I didn't [00:41:36] say these people [00:41:37] suffered. I think they did [00:41:38] suffer, and they are [00:41:39] suffering. [00:41:40] [00:41:41] And [00:41:42] [00:41:43] that's a choice you [00:41:44] gotta make. I [00:41:45] mean, what, [00:41:46] what is it worth [00:41:47] to you to [00:41:48] solve this [00:41:49] problem? Can you [00:41:50] get help from your [00:41:51] neighbors and shoulder [00:41:52] some of the [00:41:53] responsibility?
Miranda Spivack: Which [00:41:54] Richard Baltuck [00:41:55] in, uh, [00:41:56] Maryland did when [00:41:57] he was [00:41:58] looking, trying to [00:41:59] sort of [00:42:00] deconstruct this, [00:42:01] [00:42:02] [00:42:03] situation where [00:42:04] the state of [00:42:05] Maryland's [00:42:06] transportation department was [00:42:07] refusing to give [00:42:08] him [00:42:09] information that your tax [00:42:10] dollars had paid [00:42:11] for. It was just, [00:42:12] [00:42:13] anyway [00:42:14] it, [00:42:15] it just, [00:42:16] you know, it's hard work. [00:42:17] He was able to [00:42:18] get his neighbors [00:42:19] together and do a lot [00:42:20] of the research, and, [00:42:21] uh,
The Personal and Financial Cost of Becoming a Community Watchdog 💸😓🔍
Miranda Spivack: [00:42:22] Diane [00:42:23] somewhat has been [00:42:24] able to do that.
Michael [00:42:25] Hickey pretty [00:42:26] much operated [00:42:27] alone for a long [00:42:28] time. His marriage broke [00:42:29] up. I don't know if it was [00:42:30] related or not. [00:42:31] But, you [00:42:32] know, th- these are [00:42:33] tough, [00:42:34] tough [00:42:35] [00:42:36] circumstances. And when you [00:42:37] have the weight of the [00:42:38] government and private [00:42:39] corporations [00:42:40] arrayed [00:42:41] against you, that, you [00:42:42] know, you really have to think [00:42:43] hard.
Is this [00:42:44] worth my [00:42:45] time? Is it, [00:42:46] uh, [00:42:47] am I really-- Where am [00:42:48] I gonna come out on [00:42:49] this? Am I [00:42:50] just gonna be [00:42:51] defeated by, by the [00:42:52] end?[00:42:53]
Bruce Anthony: [00:42:54] Financially, it, [00:42:55] financially it [00:42:56] costs as well, [00:42:57] right? Because you said [00:42:58] the, the [00:42:59] gentleman in New [00:43:00] York had to [00:43:01] personally [00:43:02] pay for the [00:43:03] water to get [00:43:04] tested.
Miranda Spivack: [00:43:05] You did
Bruce Anthony: there [00:43:06] any type of, when [00:43:07] he proves it, a [00:43:08] reimbursement
Miranda Spivack: [00:43:09] Yeah, [00:43:10] that's a good [00:43:11] question. Uh, [00:43:12] they have [00:43:13] gotten-- there have [00:43:14] been some settlements in [00:43:15] that case with [00:43:16] the big [00:43:17] polluters. [00:43:18] And so [00:43:19] [00:43:20] individuals, including [00:43:21] Michael, got some [00:43:22] money from those [00:43:23] settlements. I don't think [00:43:24] it ever [00:43:25] will compensate him [00:43:26] for his time. [00:43:27] It's probably like a [00:43:28] penny an hour or [00:43:29] something like that.
I mean, it [00:43:30] just... [00:43:31] But, but [00:43:32] that settlement [00:43:33] wasn't because he [00:43:34] unearthed the [00:43:35] problem. The settlement [00:43:36] was [00:43:37] because these [00:43:38] companies were [00:43:39] accepting some form of [00:43:40] responsibility for [00:43:41] the pollution and [00:43:42] therefore paying [00:43:43] damages essentially. [00:43:44] But [00:43:45] you know, Ben [00:43:46] Eaton in [00:43:47] Uniontown, Alabama, I [00:43:48] mean, he has just [00:43:49] taken all [00:43:50] kinds of grief [00:43:51] and [00:43:52] yet, [00:43:53] uh, he [00:43:54] persists [00:43:55] and has [00:43:56] really worked hard and [00:43:57] has built [00:43:58] something of a coalition, [00:43:59] so that helps.
[00:44:00] But, you know, the [00:44:01] only way you're gonna get [00:44:02] money back, [00:44:03] and it w- would [00:44:04] usually be your [00:44:05] lawyers, is if you [00:44:06] filed a lawsuit for a [00:44:07] public records [00:44:08] case [00:44:09] and they turned you [00:44:10] down, but in the end [00:44:11] they had to give it to you [00:44:12] because you went to [00:44:13] court, and it, again, [00:44:14] depends on the [00:44:15] state. It's not true in [00:44:16] every state.
You [00:44:17] can get some [00:44:18] compensation. [00:44:19] Usually goes to the [00:44:20] lawyers,
Bruce Anthony: [00:44:21] Hmm.
Miranda Spivack: but, [00:44:22] [00:44:23] always win. Oh, [00:44:24] yeah.[00:44:25]
Bruce Anthony: You've been
Staying Objective After 40 Years of Emotionally Brutal Stories 🧊📰❤️
Bruce Anthony: doing [00:44:26] this for 40 [00:44:27] years, [00:44:28] and I know [00:44:29] there's, s- there's a [00:44:30] little part [00:44:31] that we're s- [00:44:32] journalists, which we [00:44:33] were taught, I think [00:44:34] it was one of the first [00:44:35] lessons that I learned, you gotta [00:44:36] remove your [00:44:37] emotion,
Miranda Spivack: [00:44:38] Yeah
Bruce Anthony: and you gotta [00:44:39] just be [00:44:40] objective, get the [00:44:41] facts. [00:44:42] But [00:44:43] hearing these [00:44:44] stories, even for [00:44:45] 40 [00:44:46] years, has [00:44:47] to affect you [00:44:48] [00:44:49] emotionally.[00:44:50]
What does [00:44:51] that look like [00:44:52] for you on [00:44:53] a day-to-day [00:44:54] basis [00:44:55] when you're getting [00:44:56] new information [00:44:57] and you're [00:44:58] hearing these stories [00:44:59] and these struggles these [00:45:00] people are, are [00:45:01] going through, [00:45:02] but [00:45:03] you have a job to [00:45:04] do?
Miranda Spivack: Yeah.[00:45:05]
Well, you [00:45:06] know, yeah, [00:45:07] it's an interesting question [00:45:08] because some of [00:45:09] what people in the [00:45:10] book told [00:45:11] me wasn't [00:45:12] accurate, and I [00:45:13] had to vet it, [00:45:14] and I did vet [00:45:15] it, and I was able [00:45:16] to correct it, [00:45:17] you know, and didn't [00:45:18] write it. [00:45:19] And it wasn't because [00:45:20] they did that out of [00:45:21] malice. I think they [00:45:22] did it, either [00:45:23] they were trying to [00:45:24] please me in a [00:45:25] way, you know, they wanted [00:45:26] the story to go a [00:45:27] certain way or, [00:45:28] or they just [00:45:29] made a mistake.
[00:45:30] And, you know, but it [00:45:31] was innocent, I [00:45:32] think. [00:45:33] [00:45:34] So, [00:45:35] you know, I'm [00:45:36] always on the alert, [00:45:37] I guess [00:45:38] which [00:45:39] I suppose [00:45:40] means a high [00:45:41] state of, [00:45:42] well, whatever, [00:45:43] I don't know, [00:45:44] tension, whatever.
Bruce Anthony: Mm-hmm. [00:45:45] [00:45:46]
Miranda Spivack: You know, I, [00:45:47] I, I [00:45:48] certainly [00:45:49] can empathize [00:45:50] with these folks [00:45:51] but still try to [00:45:52] tell their story [00:45:53] straight. [00:45:54] And, [00:45:55] [00:45:56] it's, you, you know, [00:45:57] you're raising an interesting [00:45:58] issue because I am [00:45:59] temporarily [00:46:00] right [00:46:01] now, uh, visiting [00:46:02] my daughter and [00:46:03] her family [00:46:04] in Berkeley, [00:46:05] California, where there is [00:46:06] an enormous [00:46:07] unhoused [00:46:08] problem, [00:46:09] and this [00:46:10] is an affluent [00:46:11] community.
And I'm sitting [00:46:12] here, I mean, I'm [00:46:13] gonna go to a city [00:46:14] council meeting, I think, [00:46:15] trying to figure out [00:46:16] why aren't they solving [00:46:17] it? You know, [00:46:18] why are [00:46:19] people living on [00:46:20] the street and in [00:46:21] doorways [00:46:22] in certain parts of the [00:46:23] city? Not all, you know, [00:46:24] not in the more affluent [00:46:25] part of the city. But, [00:46:26] and, and [00:46:27] I'm thinking, [00:46:28] "This is just [00:46:29] [00:46:30] insane."
[00:46:31] And, you know, I [00:46:32] guess what my [00:46:33] work has done is [00:46:34] en- I hope [00:46:35] enabled me to be a [00:46:36] good [00:46:37] citizen too
Bruce Anthony: Hmm. [00:46:38] [00:46:39] What, [00:46:40] what goes through [00:46:41] your mind [00:46:42] [00:46:43] when, for instance, [00:46:44] the [00:46:45] people that are [00:46:46] telling you this [00:46:47] story, it doesn't [00:46:48] quite check out. It's not [00:46:49] exactly what [00:46:50] they said. [00:46:51] You vetted it [00:46:52] and, and, and [00:46:53] for ver- [00:46:54] whatever reason, [00:46:55] they mess up the [00:46:56] story [00:46:57] and you're like, "Oh,[00:46:58]
Miranda Spivack: [00:46:59] Yeah.
Bruce Anthony: isn't true [00:47:00] what you told me, [00:47:01] and
here's, [00:47:02] here's the facts." [00:47:03] Like, what is that like when, [00:47:04] when these people are [00:47:05] opening up to you [00:47:06]
Miranda Spivack: Right
Bruce Anthony: to come [00:47:07] back and say, "You, [00:47:08] this, this [00:47:09] wasn't
Miranda Spivack: Right. [00:47:10] Right.
Bruce Anthony: [00:47:11] me"?
Miranda Spivack: [00:47:12] Well, I mean, I [00:47:13] have to be very [00:47:14] straightforward about that, [00:47:15] and, and also [00:47:16] because I wanna [00:47:17] re-verify, you know, let [00:47:18] them have a chance [00:47:19] to say, [00:47:20] "Okay, [00:47:21] [00:47:22] oh, you [00:47:23] know, maybe I did [00:47:24] mess that up, and here's [00:47:25] how I got that [00:47:26] information." But, [00:47:27] you know, and then I'm saying, "Well, [00:47:28] here's how I got that [00:47:29] information, [00:47:30] so let's try to match [00:47:31] this up."
I, [00:47:32] I just think you have to be [00:47:33] careful. [00:47:34] And, [00:47:35] [00:47:36] y- you know, [00:47:37] I don't-- [00:47:38] I, I, I would [00:47:39] ascribe malicious [00:47:40] intentions [00:47:41] to [00:47:42] somebody [00:47:43] who's more expert [00:47:44] at this. You know, [00:47:45] a member of [00:47:46] Congress, for [00:47:47] example, a president of the [00:47:48] United States, for [00:47:49] example. People who [00:47:50] lie regularly. [00:47:51] [00:47:52] But I-- you know, when [00:47:53] you're dealing with [00:47:54] people who are not [00:47:55] experienced, and they're [00:47:56] not experienced talking to [00:47:57] a journalist [00:47:58] either,
[00:47:59] um, [00:48:00] you know, you just [00:48:01] try to do your [00:48:02] best and, and [00:48:03] help them do their [00:48:04] best.
I think it's, [00:48:05] it, it is [00:48:06] a [00:48:07] relationship. It's not [00:48:08] [00:48:09] hostile in this [00:48:10] case, and, [00:48:11] you know, I'm just [00:48:12] trying to help [00:48:13] them tell [00:48:14] their story. Not the [00:48:15] best version of [00:48:16] their story, but
Bruce Anthony: [00:48:17] But their story, yeah. [00:48:18] You
Local Organizing Gives Ordinary Citizens Real Political Power 👥🗳️💪
Bruce Anthony: [00:48:19] said [00:48:20] you just wanna [00:48:21] be a good [00:48:22] citizen, and that's kind of the [00:48:23] reason why you're probably gonna go [00:48:24] to that city council [00:48:25] meeting in [00:48:26] Berkeley. It's [00:48:27] probably also the reason why [00:48:28] you wrote this book and the [00:48:29] reason why you became a [00:48:30] journalist at [00:48:31] large. [00:48:32] What is it [00:48:33] that you want people [00:48:34] to get [00:48:35] from your [00:48:36] book?[00:48:37] [00:48:38]
Miranda Spivack: Well, I [00:48:39] think that [00:48:40] [00:48:41] people generally [00:48:42] don't have a sense [00:48:43] of how much power [00:48:44] they actually hold, [00:48:45] [00:48:46] and [00:48:47] that public [00:48:48] officials [00:48:49] will [00:48:50] listen. There's-- [00:48:51] They will especially [00:48:52] listen if there are 50 [00:48:53] of you, not [00:48:54] two of you. [00:48:55] And [00:48:56] so you need to [00:48:57] learn to [00:48:58] organize. You need to [00:48:59] understand what you're [00:49:00] entitled to, what your [00:49:01] tax dollars have [00:49:02] paid for that you are [00:49:03] entitled to learn [00:49:04] about, [00:49:05] and that [00:49:06] you can make a [00:49:07] difference.
And I, [00:49:08] and I think the, [00:49:09] that's what the book [00:49:10] shows is that even in [00:49:11] very difficult [00:49:12] times, which [00:49:13] we are in, [00:49:14] you [00:49:15] can make a [00:49:16] difference, especially at [00:49:17] the state and local [00:49:18] level. And then when you do it [00:49:19] there, whether it's an [00:49:20] environmental [00:49:21] issue or [00:49:22] a safety [00:49:23] issue or an [00:49:24] education issue, [00:49:25] it can ripple [00:49:26] nationally.
[00:49:27] And so [00:49:28] it's okay to [00:49:29] start local, and [00:49:30] that's where I think [00:49:31] you can have the biggest [00:49:32] [00:49:33] impact
Bruce Anthony: miranda, [00:49:34] I think that's a [00:49:35] perfect way to end this [00:49:36] conversation.[00:49:37]
Uh, I [00:49:38] love everything that you [00:49:39] said. I, I just [00:49:40] like speaking to journalists, [00:49:41] so thank you so [00:49:42] much for coming on the [00:49:43] show. Thank you so [00:49:44] much for talking [00:49:45] to us about your book, [00:49:46] and thank you so much [00:49:47] for talking to [00:49:48] how we [00:49:49] can be [00:49:50] good [00:49:51] neighbors [00:49:52] to each other [00:49:53] by just [00:49:54] going and fighting the [00:49:55] power, as
Miranda Spivack: [00:49:56] Yeah
Bruce Anthony: would say.[00:49:57]
But thank you so much for [00:49:58] coming on the show. It was [00:49:59] really my pleasure
Miranda Spivack: [00:50:00] Oh, it was great. [00:50:01] Thanks a lot, Bruce. I [00:50:02] really enjoyed it[00:50:03]
Bruce Anthony: [00:50:04] Absolutely
Closing: The Truth Is Often Buried Where Nobody Thinks to Look 🔎📄📰
Bruce Anthony: Before we [00:50:05] end, I know, I [00:50:06] know, I know I'm gonna [00:50:07] harp on something [00:50:08] that I said at the top, [00:50:09] that I [00:50:10] reiterated [00:50:11] in the interview, [00:50:12] [00:50:13] but I [00:50:14] still feel [00:50:15] like I need to [00:50:16] continuously [00:50:17] stress it, [00:50:18] especially [00:50:19] where we are in [00:50:20] today's [00:50:21] society. [00:50:22] Real journalism [00:50:23] is not about winning an [00:50:24] argument. [00:50:25] It's not about [00:50:26] collecting only the [00:50:27] details that confirm what [00:50:28] you already [00:50:29] believe. [00:50:30] It's not a [00:50:31] panel of people shouting [00:50:32] over one another [00:50:33] or a [00:50:34] personality turning every [00:50:35] story into a [00:50:36] performance. [00:50:37] [00:50:38] Journalism at its [00:50:39] best [00:50:40] is the patient [00:50:41] and sometimes [00:50:42] uncomfortable [00:50:43] pursuit [00:50:44] of what is true.[00:50:45]
It [00:50:46] is asking [00:50:47] another question when the [00:50:48] first answer [00:50:49] does not make sense. [00:50:50] It is [00:50:51] checking the document [00:50:52] instead of trusting [00:50:53] the headline. [00:50:54] It's following the [00:50:55] evidence even [00:50:56] when that evidence [00:50:57] leads somewhere you [00:50:58] didn't expect [00:50:59] or [00:51:00] forces you to [00:51:01] admit that your [00:51:02] original assumption [00:51:03] was wrong. [00:51:04] That [00:51:05] work matters [00:51:06] because the [00:51:07] truth does not [00:51:08] always announce [00:51:09] itself loudly.[00:51:10]
Sometimes the [00:51:11] truth is sitting [00:51:12] inside a contract [00:51:13] that most people do not [00:51:14] know exists. [00:51:15] Sometimes it [00:51:16] is buried in [00:51:17] technical [00:51:18] reports, government [00:51:19] records, [00:51:20] legal agreements, [00:51:21] environmental [00:51:22] testing, or a [00:51:23] decision made in a [00:51:24] meeting that almost [00:51:25] nobody attended. [00:51:26] And [00:51:27] when local [00:51:28] journalism [00:51:29] disappears, so does [00:51:30] one of the strongest [00:51:31] lines of defense [00:51:32] ordinary people [00:51:33] have against [00:51:34] being ignored.[00:51:35]
We [00:51:36] lose the reporters [00:51:37] who know the history of [00:51:38] the neighborhood. [00:51:39] We lose the [00:51:40] people who [00:51:41] recognize when [00:51:42] officials' [00:51:43] explanation doesn't [00:51:44] match what happened [00:51:45] last year. [00:51:46] We [00:51:47] lose the person [00:51:48] sitting through the [00:51:49] boring meeting long [00:51:50] enough to hear the one [00:51:51] sentence that [00:51:52] changes [00:51:53] everything. That [00:51:54] is the reason why [00:51:55] Miranda Spivak's [00:51:56] work is [00:51:57] so [00:51:58] important. In Backroom [00:51:59] Deals in Our [00:52:00] Backyards, [00:52:01] she doesn't only [00:52:02] examine what [00:52:03] institutions were able to [00:52:04] conceal, [00:52:05] she centers the people [00:52:06] who refuse to [00:52:07] accept that [00:52:08] concealment.
[00:52:09] These were ordinary [00:52:10] people whose lives [00:52:11] were interrupted by [00:52:12] something that felt [00:52:13] wrong. They [00:52:14] didn't begin [00:52:15] with [00:52:16] influence, [00:52:17] advanced training, [00:52:18] or a powerful [00:52:19] organization behind [00:52:20] them. [00:52:21] They began with [00:52:22] questions. [00:52:23] Then [00:52:24] came the research. [00:52:25] Then [00:52:26] came the [00:52:27] resistance. [00:52:28] Then came the [00:52:29] moment when they had to [00:52:30] decide whether [00:52:31] being dismissed, [00:52:32] [00:52:33] criticized, [00:52:34] isolated, or [00:52:35] exhausted was [00:52:36] enough to make them [00:52:37] stop, [00:52:38] and instead [00:52:39] they kept going.[00:52:40]
[00:52:41] That doesn't mean that the [00:52:42] fight was easy [00:52:43] or that every [00:52:44] problem was neatly [00:52:45] solved. Some [00:52:46] of these people paid a [00:52:47] serious personal [00:52:48] price for [00:52:49] demanding answers. [00:52:50] They [00:52:51] sacrificed time, [00:52:52] money, [00:52:53] relationships, [00:52:54] comfort, [00:52:55] and [00:52:56] pieces of their own [00:52:57] peace. [00:52:58] But their [00:52:59] stories remind [00:53:00] us that [00:53:01] expertise can be learned. [00:53:02] Public [00:53:03] records belong to the [00:53:04] public, [00:53:05] and one determined [00:53:06] person can force a [00:53:07] community to [00:53:08] confront something [00:53:09] it would rather [00:53:10] avoid.
[00:53:11] Miranda's book [00:53:12] also reminds [00:53:13] us that being [00:53:14] heard is rarely [00:53:15] just about having the [00:53:16] truth. [00:53:17] Sometimes you can have [00:53:18] the evidence and [00:53:19] still struggle to [00:53:20] get anyone to [00:53:21] listen. [00:53:22] That's where [00:53:23] journalism becomes [00:53:24] more than an [00:53:25] industry. It becomes a [00:53:26] public service. [00:53:27] It gives [00:53:28] people language for [00:53:29] what they are [00:53:30] experiencing.
It connects [00:53:31] one person's [00:53:32] struggle to a larger [00:53:33] pattern. It [00:53:34] places information [00:53:35] in front of a [00:53:36] community that powerful [00:53:37] people may have [00:53:38] preferred to keep [00:53:39] scattered, [00:53:40] confusing, [00:53:41] or [00:53:42] invisible. [00:53:43] So I encourage you to [00:53:44] support Miranda's [00:53:45] work and pick up [00:53:46] Backroom Deals in [00:53:47] Our Backyards, How [00:53:48] Government [00:53:49] Secrecy Harms Our [00:53:50] Communities [00:53:51] and Local Heroes [00:53:52] Fighting Back.[00:53:53]
Read it for [00:53:54] the [00:53:55] investigations, but also [00:53:56] read it for the people. [00:53:57] Read it for the [00:53:58] person who noticed [00:53:59] something was wrong. [00:54:00] Read it for the person who [00:54:01] was told to let it [00:54:02] go. [00:54:03] Read it for the person who [00:54:04] kept searching after [00:54:05] the institutions [00:54:06] around them made [00:54:07] truth difficult [00:54:08] to [00:54:09] reach but here's the [00:54:10] uncomfortable part [00:54:11] people don't wanna talk [00:54:12] about. [00:54:13] The people in power [00:54:14] are not the only [00:54:15] reason important [00:54:16] truths remain hidden. [00:54:17] [00:54:18] Sometimes the truth [00:54:19] stays hidden [00:54:20] because the rest of us [00:54:21] are too busy, [00:54:22] too [00:54:23] distracted, too [00:54:24] discouraged, or too [00:54:25] willing to believe that [00:54:26] someone else will [00:54:27] do the digging.[00:54:28]
So the [00:54:29] question is not [00:54:30] only whether journalists [00:54:31] will continue to search for the [00:54:32] truth. They [00:54:33] will. That's a easy [00:54:34] question to answer. [00:54:35] The [00:54:36] real question is [00:54:37] whether we will [00:54:38] support them [00:54:39] when they [00:54:40] search for the truth, [00:54:41] whether [00:54:42] we will [00:54:43] listen to the people [00:54:44] fighting to be [00:54:45] heard, and [00:54:46] have the courage to [00:54:47] act [00:54:48] once the truth [00:54:49] finally [00:54:50] reaches us.[00:54:51] [00:54:52]
Ladies and [00:54:53] gentlemen, I wanna thank you [00:54:54] for listening. [00:54:55] I wanna [00:54:56] thank you for watching, [00:54:57] and [00:54:58] until next time, [00:54:59] as [00:55:00] always, [00:55:01] [00:55:02] I'll [00:55:03] holla
Woo. [00:55:04] That was a hell of a [00:55:05] show. Thank [00:55:06] you for rocking with [00:55:07] us here on [00:55:08] Unsolicited Perspectives with [00:55:09] Bruce Anthony. Now, [00:55:10] before you go, [00:55:11] don't forget to [00:55:12] follow, [00:55:13] subscribe, [00:55:14] like, comment, [00:55:15] and share our [00:55:16] podcast. Wherever you're [00:55:17] listening or watching [00:55:18] it to it, pass it along [00:55:19] to your friends. If you [00:55:20] enjoy it, that means [00:55:21] the people that you rock, [00:55:22] we'll enjoy it [00:55:23] also.
So [00:55:24] share the wealth, [00:55:25] share the knowledge, [00:55:26] share the noise. [00:55:27] For [00:55:28] all those people that [00:55:29] say, well, I don't have [00:55:30] a YouTube. If you have a [00:55:31] Gmail account, you have a [00:55:32] YouTube. [00:55:33] Subscribe to our YouTube [00:55:34] channel where you can actually [00:55:35] watch our video [00:55:36] podcast and YouTube [00:55:37] exclusive content. [00:55:38] But [00:55:39] the real party is on [00:55:40] our Patreon page [00:55:41] after Hours [00:55:42] Uncensored and talking [00:55:43] straight ish after [00:55:44] Hours.
Uncensored is [00:55:45] another show with my [00:55:46] sister, and once [00:55:47] again, the key [00:55:48] word there is [00:55:49] uncensored. Those are [00:55:50] exclusively on our [00:55:51] Patreon page. [00:55:52] Jump onto our [00:55:53] [00:55:54] [00:55:55] website@unsolicitedperspective.com for all [00:55:56] things us. That's where you can [00:55:57] get all of our [00:55:58] audio video, [00:55:59] our blogs. [00:56:00] And even buy our [00:56:01] merch. And if you [00:56:02] really feel generous [00:56:03] and want to help us [00:56:04] out, you can [00:56:05] donate on our [00:56:06] donations page.
[00:56:07] Donations go [00:56:08] strictly to improving [00:56:09] our software and [00:56:10] hardware so we can [00:56:11] keep giving you guys [00:56:12] good content that [00:56:13] you can [00:56:14] clearly listen to [00:56:15] and that you can clearly [00:56:16] see. So any [00:56:17] donation would be [00:56:18] appreciative. Most [00:56:19] importantly, I wanna [00:56:20] say thank you, [00:56:21] thank you, [00:56:22] thank you [00:56:23] for listening [00:56:24] and watching and [00:56:25] supporting us, [00:56:26] and I'll catch you next [00:56:27] time.
[00:56:28] Audi 5,000 [00:56:29] [00:56:30] [00:56:31] [00:56:32] [00:56:33] [00:56:34] Peace.